February 24, 2010 at 10:11am
I give up. I have accepted the fact that I will never understand the new scoring system for skating. I do not understand how America's Mirai Nagasu, who put in a short program I thought was equal or better to Japan's fourth-place finisher Miki Ando, ended the night in sixth, a full 15 points behind the leader. Consider my mind effectively boggled.
All in all I found the women's short program to be surprisingly boring. Huge respect to the ladies for not falling all over the ice like their male counterparts last week. (Did anybody fall on a jump last night? I remember a couple handed landings to help with balance, but I don't recall anyone actually wiping out.) But I also found most of the programs uninspiring. I know it's hard in a short program -- they have a laundry list of elements they have to complete in a fairly short amount of time -- but for the most part the night lacked pizzazz.
The only time it really came alive for me was during the performance by first-place finisher Kim Yu-Na from South Korea. Yu is a megastar in her home country, and came into these Olympics with an enormous amount of hype (and pressure). And boy, did she deliver. Watching the several video packages NBC put together on her my skepticism about her abilities grew and grew, but her short was flawless, powerful, graceful, and impressive. She has spunk and she's not afraid to use it. Love love love this girl.
I was less impressed by the other much-hyped skater, Japan's Mao Asada, who is Yu-Na's only real competition for the gold at this point (and Yu-Na is a whopping five points ahead of second-place Asada already). NBC and the announcers kept saying how wonderful Asada was, but I didn't see it. Her routine was competently skated and solid, but I didn't see any kind of flair or glint of star power that would make me want to root for her. On the same note, the other Japanese skater, fourth-place Miki Ando, also left me cold. She started the program by throwing in a combination jump to make up for some lost points, and seemed to be throwing down the gauntlet. But after the mid-way point her routine just totally lost steam, culminating in some plodding, graceless footwork. She had potential at the start but she totally lost me by the end.
It's impossible to critique Canada's Joannie Rochette, who ended the short program in third place. News broke last week that Joannie's mother died unexpectedly, and the athlete decided to go forward with her Olympics in spite of her huge personal loss. That takes guts and a lot of personal strength, and her short program was very well executed. Afterward she broke down, as you would expect, and I found the whole thing difficult to watch. She deserves an enormous amount of credit for skating under these conditions, and skating well, but I almost feel as though we're exploiting her by watching her live through this intensely personal time.
Lastly, the Americans. As I said before, I think Nagasu was robbed. A sixth-place finish was far too low in my mind for the program she delivered. She doubled a triple combination, but aside from that, she was flawless. Not just flawless, actually, she was breathtaking - one of the most beautiful skaters of the evening. She had speed, grace, solid jumps, amazing lines, and unquestionably the best spins of anyone in the field. My guess is that her program technically wasn't as demanding as some of the others (although it didn't look that way to me), or perhaps she got screwed by skating so early in the night. But to me she should have ended in fifth, possibly fourth place.
Instead, her teammate Rachael Flatt came in ahead of her, and I just don't understand that. The same thing happened in nationals, and I didn't agree with it then. Flatt is a very consistent skater. She very rarely makes any kinds of mistakes. But she is not an exciting skater to watch. Watching her is like watching a skating instructional video: all of the elements are there, but there's no connection to what's going on, no fluidity, no grace. She hits everything and she's done. To me, Nagasu is an artist, and Flatt is an athlete. I certainly respect her abilities and the intense practices she has put in for years and years, but I don't find myself rooting for her. I hope she does well, of course, but for whatever reason I am much more invested in Nagasu, and can't help but feel like she got screwed last night.
I'll be back with my thoughts on the ladies' long program Friday morning.
Thanks Shane for the song title - nice one :o) When I saw Michael Raymond-James come walking...
about "The Walking Dead" Season 2, Episode 8: Living in the fallout
Good find shane! I was trying to figure out what it was too, I would not have pegged it as a...
about "The Walking Dead" Season 2, Episode 8: Living in the fallout
hi buckeye as luck would have it i found that track for you mate the song is by CLUTCH and is...
about "The Walking Dead" Season 2, Episode 8: Living in the fallout
Hey, i thaught the bar scene provided valuable insight into hershals self doubts..lori's car...
about "The Walking Dead" Season 2, Episode 8: Living in the fallout
well done! hey if anyone finds out what the song was called at the end of this episode that...
about "The Walking Dead" Season 2, Episode 8: Living in the fallout
Comments for "2010 Winter Olympics: Ladies' Figure Skating Short Program" (16)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Joan said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 11:22am
I totally agree with you. The fact that it was overall boring except for few instances like Yuna Kim, who was mesmerizing, being able to skate like that after a clean performance by Mao. And especially about Joanna Rochette, felt guilty that we had to sneak a view at her very personal moments. But I was also in tears when she finished her program. That's one strong woman, She deserves the gold of heart in my sports. Can't wait till this Thursday though (as boring as it may be) . Good luck to US skaters!
pbump said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 11:28am
Eric, I completely agree with everything you said. Yu-Na Kim really seems to be a great deal ahead of the other skaters, with both solid artistic and athletic ability. When it comes to Mirai, I completely sympathize with your frustration. In a new scoring system that seems more concerned about rotations and angles I understand how she could finish 6th. Do I think it's right? Heck no, Mirai brings amazing speed, joy, and heart to the ice. Plus, I'd put her spins and spiral sequences up against any of the other women. It was disheartening to see her placement, but at the same time she's still young and if she skates her best during the long program I think we can all be proud.
Joce said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 11:59am
The one complaint I have with regards to the scoring is that I feel that Yu-Na's scores were really inflated. In a way, Mao was robbed. With this huge score difference, she must skate a flawless program while Yu-Na makes 2 big mistakes of her 7 jumps. That's close to wishful thinking for Mao at this point. This marking totally takes away the competition for the long program.
Asada's style is very classical and she shouldn't be penalized for it. Coaching here really reflects these two girls styles. Yu-Na's coach is Brian Orser and he was always known to have his own flare. I think Yu-Na has a huge advantage by training in Toronto (I used to skate at the same skating club). As a Canadian, I also want to cheer for her because she trains here so there's no doubt why she has so many local fans. At this point, I think Yu-Na will win the Olympic Gold for both her and her coach (2-time Olympic Silver medalist).
I really think some adjustments to the current marking system need to be made. I actually think they are not accounting for jumps enough. A woman doing a triple axel is really a tremendous feat and men landing quads should also be a requirement for a medalist. I mean, if these women competed in the Men's Single, they'd be in contention for a medal! The men need to step it up! At the end of the day, figure skating is a sport and athleticism should take precedence over artistry.
Stephanie said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 2:01pm
Hmm, I agree with Yuna Kim being amazing (although I thought her scores were a bit inflated too) and I am a HUGE fan of Mirai Nagasu. She brings such joy to her skating, and she just has this effervescent quality that no one else (not even Yuna Kim) possesses. That makes her very very special. I agree her lines and spins are breathtaking. However, I have to disagree with your assessment of Flatt. I don't normally root for her, but I thought she did a fantastic job yesterday. She had a ton of energy, her routine was very playful, and everything was executed perfectly. I hate that a bunch of commentators and newspeople have labeled her "just an athlete" because it's really hurtful to someone who has worked their whole life in order to perform these routines. I think both Nagasu and Flatt deserved to be in front of Miki Ando. I feel sorry for Miki and think she needs to get a new coach. Artistry doesn't come easily to everyone, but it can be learned. Yu-na Kim got over her shyness, and Miki can get over her awkwardness too.
Marco Rangel said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 4:55pm
I completely thought that the short programs were very interesting not rather boring. In my opinion Mirai did very well actually much better than some of the ladies that scored ahead of her, and well to see these results really has me wondering who will really take the gold. I would of loved for Sahsa Cohen to of been able to be in the Olympics, with a great skater like that there would have been great competition, especially in artistry. A great skate from Sasha with all landed jumps and the rest is all hers. But away from that subject, above all I root for the best to win, and until Thursday can we really see who's the best in the world.
Meraine said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 5:59pm
Who are all of the us figure skaters that participated in the women's short program competition?
Joe said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 6:13pm
The full breakdown of the scores, including the scoring for each individual technical and artistic element, can be found on the Vancouver Olympic website.
I suggest that you do some basic research before declaring how you cannot understand how someone was "robbed".
Eric said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 8:45pm
Joe: Honestly, those figures are totally meaningless to me. I'm not a skating judge. I'm someone watching the performances at home, and responding to what I see. I felt that, by far, Mirai turned a much more impressive performance than some of the other skaters. The judges and their numbers and algorithms aren't going to change that opinion. And I remain confused as to who this new judging system serves, since it isn't the viewers, I don't think it's the skaters, and I don't think it's the sport. Routines that were less enjoyable to watch were scored higher. I don't get that.
Meraine: The only US skaters who participated in the women's short program were Mirai Nagasu and Rachael Flatt. We only had two spots in the women's competition.
gillian said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 9:54pm
I whole-heartly agree with Joe. Some of you need to STOP pretending to be some expert in figure skating. Your comments say much about your lack of understanding instead. Stop repeating and regurgitating the same internet rumors about how difficult it is to understand the judging criteria. It is not.
The scoring for each Technical and Artistic elements are readily available for all to see.
Yuna Kim's Triple Lutz + Triple Toe combination is judged Equal or better than Mao Asada's Triple Axel + Double Toe combination. And no other skaters can execute the combination better than Yuna. Her speed is amazing and the distant she covers in that combination is unsurpassed. That's what the judges see in Yuna. And that's what her coach, Brian Orser, is counting on to defeat Mao Asada. If Mao were to do a Triple Axel + Triple Toe combination, then I would agreed she deserves better. However, for some of you to say "Mao was robbed" says much about your ignorance or your biases.
Artistically and execution, Yuna is superior to Mao. The Americans, Flatt and Nagasu are several levels below Kim and Asada.
Eric said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 10:02pm
But Gillian, nobody who has posted here is pretending to be an expert. We're merely saying that from a spectator point of view, we preferred the performances of certain skaters to others. There's nothing wrong with that. And nobody is suggesting that Yu-Na is not leagues above the rest of the competition -- that much is obvious to anyone, judging scores or not.
Lani said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 10:03pm
dont sell mao so short. she is the only one who has beaten yuna, twice as a matter of fact in the past 2 years. in my opinion mao is pushing the sport, she is the first woman to land a 3 axel combination at the olympics, nevermind you in the short program. quite a feat. alot of men cant land that combination period. she will attempt two 3 axels in the long program thursday night. mao also has had coaching changes the past 2 years and i think it was the wrong choice. she needs someone like a frank carroll to play to mao's strengths. no offense to tatiana tarasova, but mao regressed by working with her.
anyway, i do think yuna will win gold but mao has made her a better skater and vice versa. mao will skate well and get a well deserved silver.
gillian said on Feb. 24, 2010 at 10:28pm
Eric,
My comment was towards people who were saying "Mao was robbed."
Yes, Mao's triple axel has a higher degree of difficulty than Yuna's triple lutz. Nobody disagree that Mao's the only woman with this arsenal at her disposal. However, when you put those into combinations together, Yuna having the 3Lutz + 3T and Mao's 3Axel+Double-toe, basically it's pretty much a wash. Then, from the judging standpoint, you have Yuna's superior execution, artistic element and that amazing speed and distance she covers, it's clear as a day. According to some sites, Yuna covers over 25 feet in that combinations.
Brian Orser was interviewed about Yuna's lack of 3-axel compare to Mao's repertoire. After the interview, I began to understand his coaching expertise. Basically he said when you put the combinations together, Yuna will perform two difficult jumps vs. Mao's one Very difficult jump + easier jump. Then, from the judging point of view, it comes down to the execution. And he said, this is where Yuna will shine over Mao. Orser also said that this is the reason why he wants Yuna and Mao to skate back to back, so the judges can see their contrasting styles.
That's all I'm going to say and good night.
Kayla said on Feb. 25, 2010 at 12:00am
I`m not a judging expert, but I have been watching skating for quite some time, and I might be a bit biased considering I am a HUGE Yuna Kim fan. Anyways, a triple axle may be way more harder, but it also depends on the athlete herself, if she can execute the element then there's scores right there. However, if she misses the element then there's huge points deducted. Executed elements are calculated by the base value + GOE (grade of execution (lowest : -3 , highest : 3)). Every skater has different elements executed therefore, every skater has various total base values. The thing about Yuna is that her triple triple combination has a GOE of 2.00 and her highest was a 2.20, because it's basically perfect when she executes her 3Lz-3TL(basic value = 10.00, 10.00 + 2.00 = 12.00). On the other hand, Mao's 3A-2TL, her GOE isn't as great as Yunas, only a 0.60 (basic value = 9.50, 9.50 + 0.60 = 10.10). Also, there's a component score, the component score is composed of five subjects ( choreography, footwork, interpretation, performance, and skating skills). Obviously, Yuna gets scores a whole lot more than the other skaters on her components because her footwork (hers is level 3, highest is level 4), and her interpretation, her expressions, how she expresses the music while she's on ice, choreography, her artistry, and etc.
Also, if you're still confused you can go to www.vancouver2010.com/olympic-figure-skating/schedule-and-results/ladies-short-program_fsw010201aj.html and press the " + " on the right side of the score, it tells you all the GOEs and scores and everything! Hopefully you'll understand why, instead of being a "spectator".
On a whole different subject : I`m just SO proud of Yuna! I hope she can keep up her amazing efforts. She's truly special. Also, some people argue that she's an athlete that makes TOO much income, however, she isn't selfish. She's donated to Haiti, kids whom can't afford to figure skate ( because of her past, her skates were always broken, so 1. she couldn't afford new ones, or 2. because there weren't many skates in korea, since it wasn't popular before. I`m not sure which one, because I don't know her personally.) And she's helped children suffering. She's just so kind, a great figure skater, and a sophisticated lady with many talents!
Congrats Yuna Kim! <3 & I hope I helped you understand the new scoring system a bit better (=!
Oh , and if you love yuna or mao, don't hate the "rival", they're actually great friends. It's just a friendly rival thing (=!
Jane said on Feb. 26, 2010 at 12:47am
THANK YOU. Living in Colorado Springs you'd think that Rachel Flatt's sh*t didn't stink. She makes the front page of the paper and the Facebook pages are NAUSEATING. She lives and goes to school in the richest area of town and so what I see is a rich kid who has never suffered any kind of adversity. PERIOD. I see no story in her skating. I see used kleenex compared to the Asian skaters.
eric r said on Feb. 26, 2010 at 10:43am
dead on...biased!
torrence said on Mar. 03, 2010 at 5:49pm
I think that the results were what everyone was expecting since everyone obviously thought Yuna Kim was going to win from the beginning, since so many people rooted for her to win. I think that Mirai should have atleast placed 3rd place after that free skate. First off Rochette had a few mistakes and clearly does not skate as beautiful as Mirai and with all that joy that she brings to the ice. These types of competitions should be scored without so many deductions in jumps since some skaters are better at jumping than other elements which kind of brings the performances of some of the ladies down when scoring. A skater with spins like Mirai, should be given just as much credit since it takes as much time and effort to execute one. She was perhaps one of the only ladies to perform a Layback spin which makes the other ladies typical sit spins seem like nothing, which was a good one at that. Well I'm glad Yuna won her gold medal and she deserves it, but when I saw those points I knew no one was going to top that, well Technically top that since she gets such high scores on her jumps, But also Mao should have atleast had a much higher score than that since she landed 3 triple axels overall which is quite a feat.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.