Burn After Reading (2008)

Movie Photo
IMDb Rating
(view IMDb page)

A disk containing the memoirs of a CIA agent ends up in the hands of two unscrupulous gym employees who attempt to sell it.

  • 3/5 Star Rating.
(Based on 1 Rating)
MPAA Rating:
R for pervasive language, some sexual content and violence.
Runtime:
96 Minutes
Genre(s):
Comedy, Crime
Director(s):
Ethan Coen
Joel Coen
Writer(s):
Joel Coen (written by)
Ethan Coen (written by)

City Newspaper's Review

Dayna Papaleo on September 30th, 2008

Favorite This Like this Movie? You can Favorite it on your Profile.

Though I've never actually received one, I know enough about gift horses to avoid looking such generosity directly in the oathole. But why? What is it afraid I might see? Is it plotting to bite my face? Working from a tip that the advice has little to do nowadays with equine-related presents, I decided to challenge the familiar maxim with a look at the filmography of Joel and Ethan Coen, a stellar collection that gives and gives yet asks for nothing in return (except for maybe nine bucks). But their latest offering, screwball violence entitled "Burn After Reading," finally yielded a surprising discovery.

Opening with a Google Earth-like plummet through the troposphere, "Burn After Reading" drops us at Langley, where a disbelieving, bowtied spook is getting his walking papers. "What the fuck?" turns out to be the favorite query of Osborne Cox (John Malkovich, always a hoot in his bluster), now-former CIA who announces to his chilly wife Katie (the increasingly invaluable Tilda Swinton) an intention to write his memoirs. Through a series of events involving Katie, her married lover Harry (an unappealing George Clooney), and advice of divorce counsel, a disk containing these "memwah," as Cox pompously insists on repeating, winds up in enterprising albeit inept hands.

Stealing the film from a cast literally silly with Oscar winners is Brad Pitt, sporting a modified Johnny Suede pompadour to play Chad, a charmingly vapid personal trainer now in possession of the disk. Chad's lonely co-worker Linda (Frances McDormand) wants to parlay the possibly classified material into cash that will fund lipo-, rhino-, and all the other -plasties that she is certain will land her a man. So after a screamingly funny phone call during which Chad threatens Cox with the security of his "sensitive shit," the frantic "Burn After Reading" takes wing, as this greedy, shortsighted "league of morons" gets in way over their heads, resorting to desperate actions and out-of-the-blue brutality to achieve their selfish ends.

Sounds familiar, right? Here's why: in "Raising Arizona," H.I. and Edwina were hoping to purloin a spare baby. In "Fargo," Jerry Lundegaard thought he could replace embezzled funds by ransoming the missus. In "No Country For Old Men," Llewelyn Moss wanted to hide drug money from a psychopath with a Prince Valiant bob. And in "The Big Lebowski," the Dude was merely looking to replace a rug that really tied the room together. While it's technically not a crime to recycle a device in perpetuity (hi, John Waters!), doing so without one redeemable character for whom the audience can root is a dicey move. That's the reason "The Ladykillers" remake didn't work, and that's the reason "Burn After Reading" ultimately grows tedious.

It's a shame about the sum, too, because the enjoyable parts are all there, from composer Carter Burwell's instantly recognizable thunder of timpani to game A-listers having amoral fun to the Coens' borderline-smug skewering of those who have power as well as those who think they want it. Clooney's macho tailhound - though deft with tools, let's say - seems distractingly unnecessary, especially when compared with the hilariously dimwitted Cox-Chad negotiations, Pitt narrowing his eyes whenever the cheery Chad remembers he's supposed to be intimidating. "What did we learn?" J.K. Simmons' agent asks during the too-tidy wrap-up. To paraphrase Chad, gift horses can be... deceptive.

User Reviews of Burn After Reading (1)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

User Photo
  • 3/5 Star Rating.

Eric said on Oct. 03, 2008 at 12:05am

I'm surprised this got such a high rating on IMDB. Everyone I know -- including myself -- has been kind of disappointed by this movie. The performances are good, but it's not a particularly entertaining film. There are absolutely no likable characters, except for Brad Pitt's character, who was more puppy than man. I walked out of the theater feeling nothing but the filmmakers' almost palpable disdain for America, and its citizens. And that's fine, but...not exactly a movie that made we want to rush out and see it again.

Leave A Review

(This will not be published)

(Optional)