"Noises Off"
Through July 26
Blackfriars, 28 Lawn St
$15-$25
454-1260, blackfriars.org.
Full of sexual innuendo, slamming doors, and sardines, "Noises Off" at Blackfriars Theatre is a play about a play. And believe it or not, everything is supposed to go wrong.
The show opens with a peek into a dress rehearsal in the wee hours of the morning - the day of opening night. The actors - playing actors - are preparing their production of "Nothing On," a comedy where the married Blair couple returns from Europe to unexpectedly find a tax collector and his girlfriend using their house for personal pleasures. As the Blairs desperately try to avoid being caught in the country due to their tax-evasion scheme, housekeeper Mrs. Clackett refrains from telling her employers that they are not alone in the house. Her main concern is, well, sardines.
When not rehearsing, the characters reveal many personal relationships within their acting company, including a twist that director, Lloyd, is involved with two members of the troupe at once. The characters engage in more drama backstage than on the set of their production.
But don't worry; there's enough comedy to go around.
John Haldoupis' set is full of levels and intrigue. There is a winding stone-looking staircase, and several similar-looking doors that add to the confusion and fun.
After intermission, the set turns to reveal the backstage area for a hilarious second act. As "Nothing On" transpires in front of an "audience," Blackfriars' crowd gets to witness the hostilities and near-homicides that take place behind the scenes.
The cast's chemistry makes this nearly mimed act possible, with such tight choreography that it might have been set to music - if music could even be heard over the audience's laughter.
The set then rotates back during a five-minute second intermission, and act three brings a full-out performance of the train wreck "Nothing On," complete with a drunk burglar and Mrs. Clackett in hysterics.
The third act also brought an unexpected surprise at the performance I attended - a power outage at Blackfriars! What the majority of the audience clearly thought was one of the mishaps of "Nothing On" was actually a technical issue at the theater, through which the cast moved gracefully on, finishing the play with flashlights.
A stage full of strong actors, including two gems, pulls off the hysteria with plentiful energy - although not exactly grace.
Susan Hopkins, who plays Mrs. Clackett in "Nothing On" and Dotty, the actor, fills the stage with her experience and concentration, and shines brilliantly in the third act. As she performs "Nothing On," she even laughs at the ridiculousness that ensues. As she lets go of the wacky cast's performance, the audience lets go, as well, into uproarious laughter. Her nonchalance and physical presence steals the show.
A former student of Hunter College in New York, Hopkins boasts Off-Broadway credits to her résumé, as well as local appearances at Shipping Dock, the JCC, Downstairs Cabaret, and Geva, as an original member the theater's improv troupe.
A younger cast member with as much presence and commitment, Rebecca Spindler (Brooke and Vicki, the actor), over-acts to the point of hilarity. As the "diva" of the "Nothing On" cast, Brooke is the director's pet and shows off her body more than her acting talent. Spindler nails the part and shows that it takes a good actor to play a bad one.
Spindler graduated with a BFA in theater from Niagara University, and looks like an old pro as she makes her Blackfriars debut with "Noises Off." She is clearly an audience favorite, and spends most of the show in her pink lacy skivvies. (She's not the only one who loses her clothes.)
Although the two strongest company members are women, the weakest is as well. Elizabeth Winslow, who plays Belinda Blair and Flavia, the actor, is physically awkward, in a way that doesn't add to the humor. She has a tendency to lean forward when delivering lines, which is distracting. Instead of working with the other cast members, she addresses many of her lines to the audience, in an empty way that doesn't convince. As written, the character's niceness would only be convincing with an innocent ingénue-type actress, which Winslow certainly does not pull off.
Not to discount the male performers, James Stadt should be mentioned, as he is adorable as Tim, the stage manager. As the third act begins, he addresses the audience directly to apologize for the delay, establishing that a performance of "Nothing On" will begin momentarily. His wit and knack for physical humor proves that James does not belong backstage.
The playwright, Michael Frayn, communicates his thoughts about the art of theater in a more serious manner through the promiscuous character Lloyd, director of "Nothing On," played by David Jason Kyle.
"I have not come to the theater to hear about other people's problems," the character says. "I have come to be taken out of myself and preferably not put back."
You may not have an out-of-body experience, but "Noises Off" is a slapstick show that will definitely make you laugh out loud.





Comments for "THEATER: Blackfriars' "Noises Off"" (6)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Kyle Jackson said on Jul. 25, 2008 at 8:58am
Always interesting to read a review that gives away plot twists, fawns over specific actors (with biographical details to boot) and goes out if its way to specifically excoriate others. Nice to know that theatre criticism in the City Paper has managed not to evolve past such arch nastiness.
Lynn Merritt said on Jul. 25, 2008 at 10:58am
Noises Off was hilarious, I loved it! I am however concerned about the put downs by Jessica. I think ALL performers were great. I don't think it is right to degrade a characters physical appearance. Being part of the audience we all laughed hard and long, at all performers.Good job to everyone involved! Bravo!
Phillip Brent said on Jul. 25, 2008 at 10:29pm
The author's characterization of Elizabeth Winslow is completely inaccurate - which can only be attributed to some sort of lapse in professional observation. It is an extraordinary oversight on the part of the author - one that should be brought to the editor's attention. Those of us in the know have long respected Ms. Winslow's exceptional comedic talents (most notably in Marbella, Spain), and have come to rely on her performance as the gold standard by which all others are measured. I have seen every performance of "Noises Off", and I find the enchanting Ms. Winslow to be one of the highlights that keeps me coming back. She is the glue that seems to hold this ensemble together, with her infectious charm, magnetic smile and radiant stage presence. It is a privilege indeed to see Ms. Winslow shine as an example of Rochester theater at its best.
Cy Tuda said on Jul. 26, 2008 at 10:13am
As someone who performed "Noises Off" in college and was simply blown away by the quality of Blackfriars' current production, I feel compelled to respond to Ms. Bakeman's review. While I was pleased to see that her opinions about the show are essentially positive ( as the show deserves) there are a number of inaccuracies and such that need to be addressed: 1. It is not a tax collector and his girfriend from whom the Blairs are hiding; the character of Brooke is the tax collector, while her amour is the real estate agent for the house. While plot is probably the least important thing about "Noises Off," one should be able to expect the reviewer to have read the play beforehand and (or at a minimum)be paying attention to the essentials. 2. Along those same lines, the character of Belinda--who has two children and is one of a well-heeled mid-30's couple--is not in any way designed as an ingenue part. In fact, in the recent Broadway revival (again, research!!), the part was played by Faith Prince, who is at least 45. Belinda's "niceness" comes from her maternal nature, her "mother-hen": desire to keep the show running, a quality that Ms. Winslow brought forth brilliantly. Finally, Ms. Winlsow's supposed-habit of speaking directly to the audience is again part of the plot, as, in Act Three, the character often speaks directly to the supposed-"Nothing On" audience in attempt to keep things from spiraling out of control. 3. Ms. Bakeman's criticisms of Ms. Winslow seem, besides not fully accurate, excessively harsh. Methinks I smell an inexperienced reviewer concerned about whether she is being critical enough and overcompensating as a result. Additionally, while it fine for a reviewer to highlight and praise particular actors (certainly deserving in this case), some of the biographical material (cribbed directly from the program, I might add!) seemed like filler, especially when four (!) other actors, each giving fine performances in his/her our right, didn't even receive a mention. City is a fine publication that I look forward to reading from week to week. As such, one expects its reviewers to be well-prepared and capable of the critical discernment its readers have come to expect.
Patirk O'Keefe said on Jul. 28, 2008 at 1:13am
Well, well, well somebodies friends are abit touchy. I read only an objective review by City. Maybe the "fawning" that was done in the review was legitimate praise for jobs well done. Maybe criricisms about a particular actor's performance were just that and nothing more. References to an actor's physical appearance are not off limits especially when that appearance is not right for the part. Mind you, this is all an opinion and as far as I read, the reviewer was expressing an opinion, backed by observation. And as we all did laugh hard that does not excuse a lapse or two from being duly noted by a reviewer.
I applaud this reviewer for the fortitude to express her review without candy coating elements which were less than well executed. While all in the cast were good, that does not mean they all were good enough. I think we can all agree that there are levels of ability in almost all casts and I think the reviewer was simply pointing that out.
All of this is my himble opinion based on what I observed at performance and subsequently read.
Mae Hearn said on Aug. 06, 2008 at 4:34pm
Who are the Blair's? They were certainly not in this show. Maybe the former PM and his wife popped in backstage for some tea and sardines? Note to Reviewer: Check your facts, dear.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.