City Blogs: Music Blog

June 11, 2008 at 9:51am

A letter to Kid Rock

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

Dear Kid,

A friend of mine was raving about your new song, "All Summer Long," the other day. I heard it, and now, well, I'm raving too. Kid, you were singing over the top of "Werewolves Of London" and "Sweet Home Alabama" -- not the riffs, but the actual records. What is this bullshit? I understand the current climate encourages sampling, lifting, borrowing, etc. These are nice ways of saying "ripping off." But  this isn't even a rip-off, it's a fucking copy!

At best this is lazy, and you certainly have the talent to create your own music. You are now in that enviable position to play music that immediately has an audience built out of the strength of your stardom. You've had the balls to roll with both gangsta rappers and redneck honky-tonkers. You've fucked Pam Anderson and bitch-slapped Tommy Lee, and the opening to your "Bawitdaba" video is the type of pure Russ Meyer grindhouse sleaze I love.

Yeah, listeners are lazy too, and they want to hear what they know. And I'm sure you've lost track of how many times some asshole has shouted out "Free Bird" at a show. But as an artist you just enable them, when you could be bringing them something new. It's been said that talent creates, genius steals --hell, this whole "letter to..." stuff is a blatant rip-off of Henry Rollins --  but leave the playing-someone-else's-record-while-you-talk-over-it-and-call-it-your-own-swindle to Kanye and the other whiz kids. If you must, rip off the blues like the rest of us.

Best,

Frank

Comments for "A letter to Kid Rock" (7)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

User Photo

Steve said on Jun. 11, 2008 at 10:56pm

Frank, you're giving Kid Rock too much credit. I don't know if he has pictures of some record executive with an underage naked boy, but that's the only explanation I can think of for his celebrity. It certainly isn't his talent. And on a tangent, they guy has made some money. Don't you think he could pony up for a bottle of Prell?

User Photo

Robby said on Jun. 12, 2008 at 8:31am

I don't think you are giving Kid Rock to much credit as Steve said. He has made a impact in music whether you like his work or not, it still gets played. I'm not a fan personally but I can still enjoy it every now and then, and you are right listeners are just as lazy, nobody wants to learn new songs, they want what they know and its ruining music all the way around! So who is really to blame? Kid Rock for basically rewriting something everyone already loves and automatically having people love it, or the listeners to buying into the sham. Shit, no one is telling people to listen, but its groovy and familiar. So from a business perspective it was a brilliant move on Kid's part, especially since he hasn't put anything out in a long time, its a good platform to get him back into the mainstream scene. Basically what I'm saying is I don't like it, or agree with it, but it is a smart move i suppose.

User Photo

anonymous said on Jun. 12, 2008 at 1:27pm

I doubt any serious music fan will disagree that Kid Rock has little validity outside of the commercial realm, however judging by the statement that sampling is ripping off, it shows a poor comprehension of arguably the most important movement in music since punk, hip hop. Sure there is a lot of bad commercial albums out there but work done by the likes of Public Enemy and N.W.A contain some of the best political lyrics this side of Bob Dylan (he also being a fan of Public Enemy.) Groups such as these would not be in existence if it were not for sampling. In some cases such as Kid Rock it is tacky and uncouth, however its time to face the facts,The Sugarhill Gang had their hit with "Rapper's Delight" in 1979, music continues to evolve and change, new methods and ideas merge to create new styles (Rockabilly + Country = Rock and Roll.) Sampling has been an important part of this, and theres been 29 years for the general public to come to terms with that. So if Kid Rock wants to rip off a couple classic rock songs let him, if anything it shows that he's a good 30 or 40 years ahead of the "rest of us" who are still ripping off the blues.

User Photo

Robby said on Jun. 12, 2008 at 2:57pm

But he isn't years ahead of us by doing that. The whole point is Blues is undefinable as a genera, its based on pretty much random out there cords, so if you steal a riff here or there you can pretty much make it your own (at least that how in interpreted it). Not to mention none of these guys are "sampling" they are simply dubbing a vocal track over a song and saying its theirs! That is the whole reason the credibility is in question. I he as wrote his own song and just threw that "Sweet Home Alabama" riff in at the end of the hook then this wouldn't even be a discussion, nobody would think twice about it. The point is, someone who is a FAMOUS "musician" shouldn't just be expected to write it themselves, but they shouldn't have it any other way!

User Photo

Robby said on Jun. 13, 2008 at 1:57pm

Ya know Frank, I was just thinking, what if Kid Rock actually collaborated with Warren Zevon on that song. I was listening to the commercial for his concert and it says something about other special musical guests. And if that is the case, if it was a joint effort, would it give it a little more credibility?

User Photo

Robby said on Jun. 20, 2008 at 10:19am

Well my friend that is def a valid reason why he wouldn't have collaborated with him. I honestly didn't know he had passed way, nor followed his career when he was around. My mistake. And I agree it is a rip off, I personally don't think its right for anyone to do that as i stated in my other comment. I was merely playing devils advocate. This whole thing kinda reminds me of the whole Vanilla Ice thing, he got fucked really really hard for that whole thing, but if he had just came out with the song a month ago would there have been any repercussions?

User Photo

mike said on Jun. 20, 2008 at 12:40am

...it is a rip off...and theres no way warren collaborated with him because warren (RIP) has been dead for years

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.


Recent Comments

Eric said:

Renfrew: Thanks for that response. Believe it or not, I agree with a great many of your points,...

about COMMENT: Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Singers of All Time"

Renfrew Zetz said:

I honestly don't see how "acting as though (I'm) the only person who knows best" can be read any...

about COMMENT: Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Singers of All Time"

Eric said:

Not to put too fine a point on it, Renfrew, but you're doing exactly what you're critiquing the...

about COMMENT: Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Singers of All Time"

Renfrew Zetz said:

No, "overrated" is rather a term used only by the terminally intellectually lazy and those so...

about COMMENT: Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Singers of All Time"

rockon said:

Or "overrated" can be a term referring to the general population's sheep like tendency to jump...

about COMMENT: Rolling Stone's "100 Greatest Singers of All Time"