How we process visual information in a world of rapidly changing media has become a concern for many industries, particularly advertising. How the eye perceives images and sends them to the brain is the focus of Andrew Herbert's research. Herbert is associate professor and chair of the psychology department at RIT.
"We're trying to understand what we pay attention to when we look at certain images, and what makes us stop paying attention," he says. "How much does eye contact really matter in our perception of things?"
Human eyes move 150,000 to 180,000 times a day, Herbert says, and most of the time we are unaware of it. Using an eye tracking device, Herbert's team was able to measure eye movement.
Herbert showed volunteers high resolution black-and-white images of moving human eyes. The research confirmed that human sight is naturally attracted to movement. When written words were added to the images, the volunteers unconsciously blocked out the copy and focused only on the movement. They never remembered seeing words.
"If you have a moving picture, do you read the text or do you look somewhere else?" Herbert says. "The research shows that if you're an advertiser with a message that you want to get across, you'll want to convey it in the movement. People will not read the copy."
If an advertiser wants consumers to read copy, Herbert says, don't pair the copy with moving images.
"Maybe newspapers and magazines had it right," he says.
While researchers are learning more about how the eyes send information to the brain, they are no closer to understanding why the eyes block out the copy, Herbert says.
Herbert's research was funded by Kodak and New York State, and it was conducted in collaboration with students and faculty from RIT's Carlson Center for Imaging Science.





Comments for "ADVERTISING: Study shows that eyes will forsake words for movement" (5)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Beth L. said on May. 27, 2009 at 3:31pm
Very interesting topic. You see this often in banner advertising on the web. Marketers will pair copy with moving images in an attempt to pull your eyes from the page's content to their ad. It works, but do users see the text surrounding the moving image? Probably not.
Margie C said on May. 27, 2009 at 4:34pm
My first thought is that it's like learning that the "fine print" is even finer than we thought. So much for images with disclaimers in text. While I think it's fascinating, from a neuropsychological point of view, I don't like that advertisers may just have the jump on the public, again. Caveat emptor!
Jodie said on May. 28, 2009 at 1:54am
If only researchers would take an Neuro Linguistic Programming Practitioner's course...
Billy Anglin said on Jun. 02, 2009 at 1:36pm
Eyes will forsake words for movement...Ya think? Face it. A lot of people don't like to read.
What if the research was done with other languages or forms of writing that use different types of characters. Would the results be the same? I'd guess so, but I how much the results would differ.
Sheldon John said on Jul. 10, 2010 at 11:26pm
This research supports the W3C standards ( World Wide Consortium which issues guidelines for Usability and Accessibility on the net). It's plain ugly to see lot of things moving around. Flash has it's uses. But it is often overused! Well researched article! Keep it up! Thanks for posting!
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.