A new group has formed to fight efforts to dissolve the Village of Brockport.
Pro-Brockport is a 50-member committee whose members include village Trustees Hal Legg, Kent Blair, and Scott Hunsinger; former mayor, Jo Matela; and former village trustee, Carrie Maziarz.
Brockport residents are being "blindly asked" to dissolve a level of government without knowing all of the consequences, Maziarz says.
"Dissolution in and of itself does not save money," she says.
Service cuts do save money, she says, but if the village is dissolved, residents will still have to pay off the village's debts. Abolishing the village could result in special taxing districts if residents want services not provided by the town.
Members of two groups, Brockport Tax Cutters and Brockport Tea Party Patriots, are passing a petition to dissolve the village. Proponents say dissolution would eliminate a layer of government and save taxpayers money. The village is having financial problems and Mayor Connie Castaneda has said that staying in the black without making service cuts will require a significant tax increase.
Pro-Brockport members have a number of concerns with the dissolution idea that go beyond history or emotional attachment. For one, there's a provision in state law that would let the Sweden Town Board amend or repeal Brockport's codes, Maziarz says.
Some people believe that the dissolution petition is an attempt by village landlords to eliminate the village code, she says. The Town Board could, for example, strike a village law that requires landlords to register residential rental properties.
There's also the question of village assets. Maziarz says the statute is very vague on what happens with village assets and whether they should be sold.
The way the law works, Brockport officials would have to draw up a dissolution plan. That would include a description of the services the village offers, whether those services would be provided by the town, and, if the town provides them, how that will be done, says Charlie Zettek, Center for Governmental Research's vice president. Zettek has helped with several dissolution and consolidation proposals across the region.
Zettek says the property question is pretty basic. As the default option, the property would be transferred to the town. Property could be sold leading up to the dissolution as a way, for example, to pay down debt.





Comments for "A dissolution battle in Brockport " (2)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Daniel said on Mar. 14, 2010 at 11:32am
18% property tax hike or dissolve the village government? All the Chicken Littles can run around and say how bad things will get but I would toss the Village government out on its ear. Life will go on just fine. Anarchy will not ensue just because the County takes over police services. Town code officers will pick up where Village code officers left off and not let Brockport become a shanty town. We can even still call it Brockport.
Tea Party Patriots of Brockport said on Mar. 14, 2010 at 9:27pm
Mind you that this "pro-group" is made up of government-elect and those tied in with special interest groups that can only benefit from continuing to collect our taxes until the very end. The Brockport Tax Cutters and the Tea Party Patriots of Brockport are citizen groups formed by citizens for the citizens with the sole intent on pursing benefit for the people major, because the groups were founded BY the people. Don't be fooled or misled by anything other than the numbers and the facts. God Bless. Tea Party Patriots of Brockport.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.