Senator Jim Alesi wants the state to consider a regional approach to wind farms.
Alesi's the sponsor of legislation that would establish a task force to look at wind-farm siting and permitting policies across the state. Currently, it's up to local governments to review and approve wind-farm applications. But in a recent newsletter to constituents, Alesi said the current system can pit communities against each other.
"By looking at the placement of wind farms on a region-by-region approach, rather than the current patchwork approach, energy firms, municipalities, and residents will all benefit," he said in the newsletter. [Alesi didn't return messages seeking comment.]
The task force would weigh the development of a "standardized formula for the siting of" wind farms, the potential for a statewide permitting procedure, and the possibility of compiling a statewide list of wind farm-appropriate sites. The siting formula would use factors like proximity to residential areas, impact on adjacent communities, and visual and sound impacts. The 15-member task force would issue a report to the governor by December 31.
This type of power plant siting process was in place from 1992 to the end of 2002, though wind farms weren't covered under the enabling law. Article X of the Public Service Law provided a framework for state-level reviews. When the law expired, local governments resumed review and approval responsibilities. State legislators weren't able to agree on a renewal bill.
Alesi first introduced his bill in 2007, but it's sat in the energy committee and has lacked an Assembly companion bill. This year, however, Assembly member Richard Brodsky may introduce companion legislation. If Alesi's bill is amended to match the Assembly bill, the energy committee can reassess the bill, says Adam Tableski, communications director for Senator George Maziarz, who chairs the committee.





Comments for "ENERGY: Alesi bill promotes regional wind-farm planning" (4)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
Knows Better said on Mar. 17, 2010 at 12:48pm
Once our great state figures out how much stimulus money they can rake in they will be trying to stick one of these machines on every hilltop. More state control can only be bad.
Michele said on Mar. 17, 2010 at 8:06pm
It's about time. Thank you.
Rose Meiler said on Jun. 24, 2010 at 4:25pm
Do not eve consider wind turbines. We have a grass roots effort to fingt anyone up for election who is for wind turbines. Rose Meiler
tom janowski said on Jun. 24, 2010 at 8:29pm
Rose...would you rather have the devastation and destruction of mountaintop removal to extract coal? Would you rather have hydrofracking where 592 different toxic chemicals are forced into the earth to push natural gas out? Would you rather have another oil disaster such as the the one in the gulf?
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.