Marketview Liquor
City Blogs: News Blog

January 24, 2007 at 8:35am

Health care: break for businesses?

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

 

Did President Bush in his State of the Union speech last night just give more businesses a green light to drop health insurance coverage for employees?

Despite a glowing economy, more and more Americans can not afford health insurance, don't have access to it at work or have made the decision to go without it, presumably to pay other bills like rent and fuel. The number has risen from 40 million in 2000 to about 46.5 million in 2005 according to the government's own figures. Like Katrina, which wasn't even mentioned in the President's speech, the figures show a contradictory chasm between those who are benefiting from this economy and the growing numbers of those who are not.

The problem of the uninsured is well documented and its impact on the rest of society is sobering: loss of decent paying manufacturing jobs, high numbers of personal bankruptcies, and children and adults who rely on emergency hospital care --- health care at its lowest efficiency and highest price.

Last night, Bush gave more attention to health care than in any time in his presidency mentioning the words 14 times, according to the New York Times. In 2006, he mentioned health care three times and in 2005 only once.

His solution: more tax breaks. Tax breaks and consumer choice are constant Republican themes. The two are supposed to work together in keeping businesses competitive, while lowering the costs of goods and services for consumers.

But like his medical savings accounts, the approach will work for a sliver of the work force. Under his proposal, families would not pay income or payroll taxes on $15,000 of their income. Single Americans would avoid the taxes on $7,500 of their income.

And like the medical savings accounts, it assumes most workers have the money in hand. It assumes that most single Americans do not have dependents --- a partner, a child or a sick family member. And it assumes that competition drives prices down, something that has rarely shown itself to be true in health care.

But more than anything else, the Bush proposal is another wink-nod to many businesses that are already eliminating or reducing employee benefits in order to fit a changing definition of profitability for our rosy economy.

Comments for "Health care: break for businesses?" (0)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.


Recent Comments

L rich said:

Carnival sideshow is exactly spot on! Like a trainwreck!

about SARAH PALIN: Our modern-day Anita Bryant

Jay Betts said:

Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...

about SARAH PALIN: Our modern-day Anita Bryant

Louis Richards said:

I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...

about RBTL: Canal Ponds makes its pitch

Harry Davis said:

In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...

about ELECTION 2009: WTF happened?

rochester99 said:

It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...

about RBTL: Canal Ponds makes its pitch