February 8, 2007 at 10:07am
From today's New York Times: "Few Veteran Diplomats Accept Mission to Iraq.... The White House's strategy calls on diplomats to head to some of Iraq's most hostile regions, but many refuse to go."
"Edwards and Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama had distinct perspectives on Iraq, but their other differences were, if anything, more revealing": The American Prospect's Harold Meyerson, reporting on Clinton's, Edwards', and Obama's pitches to the Democratic National Committee.
In The Nation, John Nichols looks at the implications of the mistrial declared yesterday in the court martial of Army Lieutenant Ehren Watada, who refused to be sent to Iraq because he believes the US invasion was illegal.
"Pathetic Senate, Timid Reid on Iraq War": Matthew Rothschild in The Progressive, on this week's Senate debate.
Carnival sideshow is exactly spot on! Like a trainwreck!
Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...
I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...
In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...
It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...
Comments for "IRAQ; DEMOCRATS: What we're reading" (0)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.