January 24, 2008 at 12:04pm
"The Choice," a lengthy, perceptive piece in the January 28 New Yorker outlining the differences in how Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama view the role of the president.
To Clinton, writes George Packer, "the presidency is more about pushing difficult legislation through a fractious Congress than it is about transforming society." Obama, on the other hand, has said: "It involves a vision for where the country needs to go ... and then being able to mobilize and inspire the American people to get behind that agenda for change."
"A senator," wrote Packer, "must convince fifty to sixty fellow-politicians; a president must rouse three hundred million fellow-citizens."
Arrest Obama for treason? For what? Winning an election? OK.... I think the main point that...
So, basic American principles include giving non-citizens the same rights as Americans?
This villages dissolusion has one thing that ours will not however hard they try and that is...
about Seneca Falls will dissolve village; others are watching
That's amazing. I wonder if he can be arrested for treason. When President Bush told a bold...
Comments for "WHAT WE'RE READING: What's the role of the president?" (2)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Anthony said on Feb. 05, 2008 at 5:30pm
WOW that is interesting, yet there is very good point that should be addressed. Every person has there views on the presidents role is even though it is outlined in Article II of the US constitution. I believe the framers of the constitution were right when they wrote the constitution and I find it kind of funny how each candidate perceives the role of the president. even though it is clearly outlined in the constitution .
raigne said on Feb. 16, 2008 at 2:09pm
Connecting dots imagining /wondering - an opportunity for sane policies
By Donnaca Raigne - Feb 12th, 2008 at 12:04 pm EST
I'm excited by what Barak brings to the table.
I hope ladies who are bent on casting their vote(s) for Hillary Clinton
think long and hard with
what is at stake.
Hillary and McCain are not the caliber to interact with persons world
wide. More of ther same.
Being bought persons they offer no change but much of the same.
Sorry. Hillary hubby's pardoningof Marc Rich and Lieberman's guiding
angry McCain as like a wheelbarrow.
An Obama presidency would excite peoples everywhere in a belief that
the USA was once
again on a path striving to be the hope of mankind. To have such a
talented human rise up to
become leader of the free world - what a message to send to one and all.
Were he to pick Ms Clinton as VP then we would have :) two black
presidents in the WH. I wonder if he could deal with Bill wondering if
he would tarnish the surroundings as like previously being the case.
Sharpton (T Brolly fame) Jackson (Jesse) diminished - Obama toppings all.
Whiners of such hues would be quited and their brethern left feeling
that prideful respectability from such presidency - akin to hose whom
John F. Kennedy gave pride and making people of his ancestry proud.
With 85% of the world's people being non white
what a signal to send to friend and foe alike. No more excuses but
being obliged to get on with it.
Son of an an enslaved people rising up within a short number of years -
a miracle I hope for. An America reborn for greatness renewed. Not
serving the interests of those powerful sqeeky wheel lobbyists who
drain us dry by having to protect their specialized statelet through
wars and the loss of our youthful blood along with our brainwashed
mouthings, ala Pavlov's dogs - in the process.
Just pray that Obama stays true and not stray - somehow I feel his
passion to do right. After some years having passed of insanity I'm
daring to hope.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.