City Blogs: News Blog

February 9, 2008 at 2:34pm

POLITICS: Partisanship rules in the defender selection

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

It hasn't improved my assessment of the Brooks administration, or my suspicions of Republican Party Chair Steve Minarik's role, to watch the selection of a new public defender play out.

Yes, the law (as a reader has pointed out) says that it's the County Legislature's responsibility to appoint a public defender. But that doesn't mean that a non-partisan committee couldn't have conducted the search and the screening.

That was done successfully in the past, for good reason. And I still maintain that there's only one reason the Republicans have dug in their heels on this: they want the public defender's office to be a patronage source, as it once was.

The Republicans' apparent choice for a public defender, Tim Donaher, is a highly respected attorney, with years of experience in the defender's office. Maybe he can resist pressure from the Minarik machine. We'll see.

Meantime, the all white, all male, predominantly suburban Republicans in the County Legislature have alienated African-American community leaders and turned the selection of an important public official into a racially charged issue. (Now where are those new Republican legislators who promised that they'd be independent?)

Comments for "POLITICS: Partisanship rules in the defender selection" (0)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Recent Comments

CitizenKandyKane said:

"Our candidate must be someone who can instinctively turn right to constitutional, conservative...

about Now Santorum's on top, in one poll

Anne Marie Corey said:

I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...

about Conversion disorder IS a legitimate diagnosis

Seth said:

Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns

sean said:

Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...

about Obama expected to compromise on contraceptive issue

Norm said:

The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns