City Blogs: News Blog

December 5, 2008 at 1:55pm

MOULE: County budget bits

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

With no big controversy to draw out crowds of people, last night's hearing on the proposed 2009 county budget was relatively tame.

Last year, residents turned out in droves to protest a now-defunct plan to reduce the amount of sales-tax revenue given to suburban school districts. This year, there were only a few speakers - one urged the Lej not to raise taxes, while another suggested that the county look at expanding plastics recycling to generate more revenue and prolong the life of the Mill Seat Landfill.

But it's what wasn't mentioned during the hearing that surprised me.

Nobody brought up county funding for the Cornell Cooperative Extension. Over the past decade or so, the county's made steady cuts in its contribution to the agency. In 2006, the Lej approved cutting the contribution in half.

This year, the agency made a good-faith effort to retool its operation and refocus its mission, at least in part to try to get some of that funding back. But the 2009 budget proposal still holds the county's contribution at $250,000.

With a difficult budget year and slow economy, it could be that Extension supporters are relieved there were no further cuts.

Nobody said anything about library funding, either. Each year the budget includes a $6.6-million contribution to the county library system's central services. That contribution has been flat for at least the past five years and supporters have advocated for a bump in the funds. Again, maybe folks are just relieved to see that the contribution wasn't cut.

Also on the budget scene, WXXI's Rachel Ward has a really interesting story about the county's plans to securitize payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreements to help plug a $33 million budget gap. A securities expert tells her that municipalities typically use PILOT income to back bonds instead. The county, he says, would serve as a "guinea pig" for this approach, and they'd be doing so in a volatile market. (County spokesman Noah Lebowitz told Ward that no municipality has ever tried this approach.)

There's a pretty likely reason why the county's not going the typical route: bonding requires the approval of two-thirds of the Legislature. With a single-vote difference in the chamber, that means some Democrats would have to vote in favor of the measure, which they probably wouldn't do. The Lej will still have to approve the sale - last night county Chief Financial Officer Scott Adair told legislators that he expects to raise $10 million by securitizing $12 million worth of PILOT payments - but that requires a simple majority of votes.

Comments for "MOULE: County budget bits" (0)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Recent Comments

Anne Marie Corey said:

I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...

about Conversion disorder IS a legitimate diagnosis

Seth said:

Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns

sean said:

Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...

about Obama expected to compromise on contraceptive issue

Norm said:

The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns

Tom Janowski said:

The more I know about President Obama, the less I know him. This is never a good thing during...

about Obama expected to compromise on contraceptive issue