January 13, 2009 at 11:13am
I don't want to power my car on turkey guts. Yes, this is a real dilemma I may one day have to consider.
This is all rooted in the anything-to-oil business. The basic theory and practice is that any number of materials can be converted into a petroleum-like substance through heat and pressure. The resulting "biocrude" can be refined into various fuels.
Recently, Discover magazine ran a report on a Missouri operation that does just that - the magazine periodically checks in on the plant to monitor the technology's viability. Here's the catch: the majority of the waste used by the plant is offal from a nearby Butterball rendering plant - turkey guts.
This is where a bit of an ethical dilemma arises. As a vegetarian, I tend to reject the slaughter of animals for food. It's my choice, a personal choice, and one I don't expect all people to make. I respect that. But it's a choice I make not just out of compassion for the animals, but also for concerns ranging from personal health to deforestation.
Using offal to generate biocrude carries the same issues, and I'd be similarly opposed to putting the fuel in my tank. If this technology catches on, the manufacturing companies should consider listing what materials were used to make the crude, that way people can monitor what's in it - similar to the ingredients labels on food.
Otherwise, this business of anything-to-oil is fascinating. It raises a lot of questions - does the process result in more energy than it consumes? Does it generate any sort of pollution? Will it discourage much-needed waste-reduction programs? Will there be any peripheral issues? In other words, we should apply the lessons we learned from corn ethanol.
Locally, we might have a chance to get some answers. Casella Waste Systems has filed an application with the DEC to set up an experimental waste-to-energy operation at the Ontario County Landfill. It plans to focus on unrecyclable paper and plastic that come to the facility, the company's district manager, Larry Shilling, told me last month.
I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...
Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...
about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns
Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...
The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...
about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns
The more I know about President Obama, the less I know him. This is never a good thing during...
Comments for "MOULE: Animals are not fuel " (3)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Ken said on Jan. 14, 2009 at 9:08am
Interesting dilemma in which the opinion author resides. Curious if Moule is currently driving using ethanol. Our corn supply was nominal for our consumer needs prior to the rapid rise in corn-based ethanol in the past decade. The increased acreage required for corn-based ethanol causes more deforestation than previous. Moule should take the time to understand all the commodities from corn syrup to soft-drinks which emanate from corn, as a current consumer of commodities causing deforestation. Question your own ethics before challenging those of others.
Jeremy Moule said on Jan. 14, 2009 at 12:16pm
Ken,
The whole point of the post was to question my own ethics. Hence the caveat that vegetarianism is a personal decision, and the choices I make related to it are too -- in this case refusing to fuel my car with Butterball, should it ever be an option. I don't expect anyone to share my opinion, though some people probably do.
As for corn-based ethanol, we agree. When I said "we should apply the lessons we learned from corn ethanol," I was referring to the numerous unexpected and undesired side effects -- the energy that is consumed making the fuel, the impact that using corn for fuel has had on food prices, and, as you say, the impact it has on land use. We learned that fuel shouldn't be linked to food supplies, and we learned that we really need to explore the outlying effects associated with new fuel sources. (And let's not forget, corn is also heavily used as livestock feed.)
David J. Champagne said on Jan. 21, 2009 at 3:55pm
There was a time that farmers had stills to make alcohol. And no, it was not to just imbibed in, but to run their autos, farm equipment, and to heat their homes. Alcohol could be made out of just about anything organic. Prohibition came along. Lobbied by the oil corporations. I believe it was John Rockefeller. Standard Oil. Lobbied congress with the help of religious groups, to ban the stills, in the guise of protecting people from over imbibing.
Vegans? Well, they just hate plants.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.