April 9, 2009 at 11:56am
Friends of the Rochester Public Library hosted a presentation on land value taxation and a discussion with Joshua Vincent, executive director of the Henry George Foundation of America, yesterday.
The foundation is a think-tank for the study of economics and LVT. Vincent has worked with more than 75 cities to study the impact of a conversion from the standard form of property taxation to LVT.
The typical municipal property tax levies a lower value on land and puts a greater value on the improvements to the land, such as building a home or an office building.
LVT works in reverse. There is a higher flat tax placed on the land, and in most cases there is no tax placed on the improvements.
Advocates of LVT argue that the standard property tax has many disadvantages, and is at least partly responsible for urban decline, sprawl, and businesses leaving cities.
The examples they give can be quite convincing. For instance, under the standard property tax system, owners of vacant land and deteriorating properties are rewarded for allowing their properties to remain run down.
And they contribute less to the city's tax base while they cause urban blight - ultimately another cost to taxpayers.
And those property owners who do restore older properties or make expansions to existing properties are penalized with higher assessments.
Most of the conversions to LVT in the US have occurred in Pennsylvania. Harrisburg and Pittsburg have converted to LVT, and their comebacks have been credited to the switch. Philadelphia is about to make the shift, which would make it the largest city in the US to convert to LVT.
Vincent argues that many of the same conditions that impacted PA's rustbelt cities still plague Buffalo and Rochester.
"Rochester has backed itself into a corner in its tax policy," Vincent says. "No one wants to shut down services. But every year city governments in New York are chasing more tax revenue from fewer and fewer people."
Vincent will be meeting with members of City Council today at 4 p.m. It should be an interesting meeting, since some Council members are already convinced that LVT would not work here.
Despite the mayor's ongoing concern about closing revenue gaps and obtaining more state aid from Albany, there were no city officials at yesterday's public discussion with Vincent.
Information: www.urbantools.org.
Carnival sideshow is exactly spot on! Like a trainwreck!
Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...
I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...
In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...
It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...
Comments for "MACALUSO: If Pittsburgh can do it" (1)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Edward J. Dodson said on Apr. 09, 2009 at 1:14pm
Moving to a land-only property tax base would be a major impetus to the housing market, and to the construction of decent, affordable housing. Land prices have fallen in many parts of upstate New York due to overall economic conditions and the gradual loss of population. However, the effectve rate of taxation on assessed land values is much too low to stimulate owners to invest in new business development or sell out to someone who would.
Back around 2004, I came to Buffalo at the invitation of the Director of our company's "Partnership Office" to give a talk to area leaders on the connection between how a community raises its revenue and the stability of its housing markets. That company was Fannie Mae, and some of our keenest minds recognized that tax policies penalizing property renovation and new construction, while allowing vacant and underimproved land to remain so year after year, decade after decade, was a recipe for self-destruction. I still have a copy of the Powerpoint presentation I gave in Buffalo and will be more than happy to send a copy via email to anyone in Rochester (or anywhere else) who asks for it. It may help convince the local officials that this is a fundamental change to kickstart an economic revitalization of the city and region. My email address is: ejdodson@comcast.net.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.