June 9, 2009 at 12:18pm
The Democrats had a tenuous hold on the State Senate majority anyway, so it's only a small shock that they were toppled from leadership, in a traditional sense.
Now, there's a sort of power-sharing agreement where Democratic Senator Pedro Espada serves as president pro tempore and Republican Senator Dean Skelos is majority leader - the post he held before Democrats took over as the majority party in January.
How exactly this all works seems uncertain to a lot of observers - as does the fate of issues like same-sex marriage and mayoral control of New York City schools. The New York Daily News' Elizabeth Benjamin had a telling line in a blog post this morning: "Since it's Tuesday, it's lobby day in Albany. Lots of special interest groups are here, but it's unclear who, exactly, they're supposed to lobby - at least on the Senate side."
Anyway, shortly after the coup, the new coalition -I guess they aren't a traditional majority, right? - passed some new rules. They include provisions to make staff budget and member-item allocations for the majority and minority more equitable.
Why didn't they do that while they were in the majority for some 40 years? Why wait until now? And for that matter, why didn't Democrats do this? After all, many of them promised they would during elections.

Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...
I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...
In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...
It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...
There has been one development, not reported about the PAC that was reinforced in the private...
Comments for "MOULE: Senate switcheroo" (1)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
mancuroc said on Jun. 10, 2009 at 9:17am
So it's come to this - a rich man who doesn't like to pay his share of taxes announces he is leaving New York State, then engineers a coup on his way out the door. The corruptible have been corrupted by the corrupt. New York government may have had its problems, but I would not have described it as a banana republic - until now. Deference to the whims of rich aristocrats is an un-American idea.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.