September 29, 2009 at 11:42am
Republicans don't have a long, solid history of supporting Medicare. If some Republicans had their way, including former President Ronald Reagan, Medicare might not exist today.
After listening to US Representative Chris Lee, who was in Rochester yesterday, you would have thought Republicans were in a desperate fight to keep Democrats from gutting the program that is so popular with seniors.
It's a cynical strategy, but it has worked. Any talk of changes to Medicare stops most seniors in their tracks.
Lee was here to make his case against the House Democrats' health-care reform proposal, HR-3200, because, he says, it will hurt Medicare recipients.
It's true that Democrats want to squeeze efficiency out of Medicare and to slow the growth of spending on the program.
House Democrats also want to cut Medicare Advantage, private insurance plans that taxpayers have subsidized for years to enhance Medicare. Advantage plans provide about $1,000 in extra services annually to recipients. About 10 million people or 25 percent of all Medicare recipients, according to a recent New York Times editorial, are enrolled in private insurance plans under Advantage.
Under the House Democrats' plan, payments to Advantage plans would be eliminated, which would force insurance companies to compete for those customers who still wish to purchase extra insurance.
And the savings, about $100 billion over 10 years, would be used to expand coverage for the uninsured, decrease hospital re-admissions, and eliminate the prescription drug "donut hole."
Lee also criticized the Democrats' plan because it does not address the liability issues that medical professionals face, calling it the driving force in escalating health care costs.
Liability is an issue for doctors and hospitals, but it's not the main reason health-care costs keep going up year after year.
Many people are reluctant to put a cap on malpractice payouts because, they say, it is the health-care system's strongest check and balance.
In a written statement yesterday, US Representative Louise Slaughter reiterated that AARP, the national organization that represents seniors, endorses the House bill.
Ultimately, the entire Medicare system would be improved under HR 3200, and all recipients would reap the benefits.
Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...
I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...
In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...
It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...
There has been one development, not reported about the PAC that was reinforced in the private...
Comments for "MACALUSO: Lee brings Medi-scare to Rochester" (1)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Chris said on Sep. 30, 2009 at 9:31am
Hey genius, how does removing $500,000,000,000 from Medicare improve it? How does forcing seniors to wait months or years for routine surgical procedures "help" them? Why do you want senior citizens to suffer and die? Don't you love your mother and father?
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.