September 23, 2009 at 11:54am
Words certainly aren't everything, but President Obama's speech to the United Nations this morning was an important one. It expressed a foreign policy that was both conciliatory and tough. And it reminded me of one of the reasons I hoped Obama would be elected president: he embraces the need for the United States to act with other nations to deal with the world's problems.
In his speech, Obama was not - as some conservatives have tried to paint him - an appeaser. He said the US will "permit no safe haven for al Qaeda to launch attacks from Afghanistan or any other nation." He criticized the governments of Iran and North Korea for pursuing nuclear weapons. "The world must stand together to demonstrate that international law is not an empty promise," he said.
He repeated his commitment that the US will be a leader in addressing climate change. "The days when America dragged its feet on this issue are over," he said.
While he didn't name names, he seemed to take a slap at Iran - and maybe at Afghanistan - noting that the UN Charter embraces the right for "citizens to have a say in how you are governed."
"Just as no nation should be forced to accept the tyranny of another nation," he said, "no individual should be forced to accept the tyranny of their own government."
It was good to hear his insistence that Israel and the Palestinians must find a way to solve their problems. "We continue to call on Palestinians to end incitement against Israel," he said, "and we continue to emphasize that America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements."
And it was good to hear his repeated support for the United Nations, and his insistence that world leaders must support it and to work to improve it.
The United Nations has many problems, and some of them - as Obama noted - prevent it from meeting world challenges that it is best suited to address. But Obama's clear message that the US is no longer thumbing its nose at the UN was important.
Since Obama took office, the United States has paid the UN dues it has owed and has joined the UN's Human Rights Council. The contrast with George Bush could not be starker.
Near the end of his speech, Obama quoted Franklin Roosevelt. "We have learned," Roosevelt said during his fourth Inaugural Address, "to be citizens of the world." To some Americans, those words are abhorrent. But behaving as if we are citizens of the world is the best path not only to our own security but also to the health and security of all countries.

Same old crap you hear from all the networks, try other sources of media for your knowledge. ...
I have heard several comparisons that name the Raleigh-Durham area, which hosts a population...
In April, just before I decided to run for Rochester City Council, I was told by a Democratic...
It’s also a tactic to ”low ball” the construction cost…especially with public sector...
There has been one development, not reported about the PAC that was reinforced in the private...
Comments for "POLITICS: Obama's UN speech is a welcome one" (4)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
Keith Hardine said on Sep. 23, 2009 at 3:28pm
'Elections Have Consequences.'
Can 'We the People of the United States,' solve the world's problems, while at the same time electing to public office-socialist elites-like President obama, who's public policies defy the authority of our United States Constitution, which he is swarn to uphold?
Read the Constitution and see if you can find justification for Government-run healthcare, auto companies, insurance companies, banks, control of climate change, the de-commissioning of our nuclear defense system, and ending-through surrender-the war on terrorism-none of these policies promote the general welfare of our country.
whip fog said on Sep. 23, 2009 at 9:43pm
We need no more commentary on national news. it's so plentiful. I miss the days when City commented and criticized at a LOCAL level. It takes courage to criticize your own neighbors, but it is necessary for local dialogue to start. What we lack is a local perspective; please give that back to us.
Mary Anna Towler said on Sep. 24, 2009 at 10:57am
Thanks for your comment, whip. But I couldn't resist noting that this newspaper has commented on national and international issues since its founding, during the Vietnam War-Richard Nixon years. We've flailed away on lots of non-local issues: the death penalty, El Salvador, the Middle East, the Iraq Wars... and we've endorsed in every presidential election since we published our first issue. We've also expressed our opinion on a multitude of local issues, from the proposed Genesee Expressway (a multi-lane highway that would have destroyed a southeast city neighborhood) and school segregation in the 1970s to Ren Square.
The reason we comment on non-local issues: those issues affect all of us. We vote for presidents and members of Congress, so surely we ought to discuss national issues over which they have influence. And we are, as President Obama said yesterday, citizens of the world. If newspapers publish opinions on local issues, seems to me they should comment on the issues of the world. And, we hope readers will add their voices to the dialogue.
Doug MIdkiff said on Sep. 25, 2009 at 7:58am
Mary Anna, you expressed my feeling exactly, as you often do. Down here in a desert of right-wing conservatives, where most get their news from Fox News and never read anything but the sport pages in the newpaper, it is heart-warming to me to know that there are others who keep the right balance. Keep on keeping on.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.