City Blogs: News Blog

March 18, 2010 at 3:48pm

Is focus shifting in health-care debate?

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

A Congressional Budget Office report says the Senate-approved health-care bill will reduce the national deficit. That might help Democrats move the public and media focus off of procedural details and onto the bill's merits.

Much of the brouhaha over the bill has focused on its cost, and opponents have often griped that the legislation would increase the national debt. The CBO report gives House Democratic leaders some solid arguments against those claims.

This morning, Congress member Louise Slaughter's office forwarded over a brief that lays out the bill's benefits to her district. Among them, says Slaughter's office:

  • People who have to buy their own insurance will receive tax credits.
  • Certain small businesses that provide employees with health care plans will be eligible for tax credits.
  • Insurers won't be able to dump subscribers if they become sick.
  • Insurance companies will be prohibited from denying affordable plans to individuals with pre-existing conditions.
  • Medicare recipients will get free preventive and wellness care and better prescription drug benefits under Medicare Part D.

Slaughter is especially keen to get the focus back on the bill's merits. As chair of the House Rules Committee, she has come under attack by Republicans and their allies for proposing the use of a procedural rule called "deeming." It's a wonky concept, but it basically lets members of the House pass the Senate-approved legislation by voting on a procedural rule and changes to the bill, not the bill itself.

Both parties have used this method in the past, but Republicans are accusing Democratic leaders of trying to ram the legislation through. If a few more Democrats come around to a yes vote, however, the bill will be ushered through, not rammed through.

Comments for "Is focus shifting in health-care debate?" (0)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Recent Comments

CitizenKandyKane said:

"Our candidate must be someone who can instinctively turn right to constitutional, conservative...

about Now Santorum's on top, in one poll

Anne Marie Corey said:

I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...

about Conversion disorder IS a legitimate diagnosis

Seth said:

Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns

sean said:

Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...

about Obama expected to compromise on contraceptive issue

Norm said:

The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns