March 10, 2010 at 10:58am
The news about the Rochester school district's latest graduation rate was no surprise; it had been expected for months. But that doesn't make it any more palatable.
For the 2008-2009 school year, the "on-time" graduation rate - for students who complete high school in four years -was 46 percent, a decline from the previous year's 52 percent.
The district's critics, predictably, are seizing on this, but they're overlooking a pertinent qualifier: the state raised the graduation requirements. Comparing the two years, then, isn't comparing apples to apples. It's hard to say what the rate would have been for 2007-2008 had the requirements been the same.
And the fact is, using the old requirements, the district's graduation rate had gone up three years in a row, from 39 percent in 2006 to 48 percent in 2007 to 52 percent in 2008.
The bad news, of course, is that the previous requirements were so weak that for many students, a diploma didn't mean much.
We still have a long, long way to go before we're giving all students what the state constitution guarantees them: "a sound, basic education."
"Our candidate must be someone who can instinctively turn right to constitutional, conservative...
I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...
Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...
about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns
Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...
The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...
about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns
Comments for "Schools: Behind Rochester's graduation numbers" (1)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
james said on Mar. 10, 2010 at 1:27pm
The current rates of graduation is nothing to brag about. The same organization has been "RUINING" our schools for decades. Only their names have changed. Why not give a chance for a new direction? One complaint is that funds will be moved from the school budget and used for other city shortfalls. If the Mayor can give the same results with less expense, go for it..
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.