Marketview Liquor
City Blogs: News Blog

March 17, 2010 at 11:00am

Seneca Falls will dissolve village; others are watching

Recommend Blog Post
Total Recommendations (0)

The residents of Seneca Falls have voted to dissolve their village, with the Town of Seneca Falls taking over many of their services. In cash-strapped New York, there's no doubt that folks across the state will watch to see how things proceed.

Seneca Falls is the largest village in New York to vote to dissolve itself, and others - including Brockport - are considering the move. An article in this morning's Democrat and Chronicle makes it clear that both sides in the Brockport debate have their eyes on Seneca Falls.

Unfortunately, Seneca Falls may not provide a good test case for one aspect of dissolution: savings for taxpayers. The D&C article reports that the Town of Seneca Falls - not the village - has a $0 tax rate because of its host community agreement for Seneca Meadows Landfill. The town gets $2.6 million a year under the agreement. Some of that money can be applied, as needed, to reduce the cost impacts of consolidation, says the dissolution proposition. Communities like Brockport-Sweden don't have that kind of revenue source to tap into.

Some of the other details are consolidation boilerplate. The town will take over services like water and refuse collection, which are paid for through fees anyway. Residents of the former village will be responsible for its debts, not the rest of the town residents. And police services would ideally be provided through a special police district covering the former village - which means only residents in that district pay police costs. A town-wide police force is possible if the state won't sign off on the police district.

dissolution study by the Center for Governmental Research estimates that village residents will see a 48 percent decrease in the tax rate.

Comments for "Seneca Falls will dissolve village; others are watching" (1)

City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.

User Photo

Ronald Schofell said on Mar. 17, 2010 at 5:33pm

This villages dissolusion has one thing that ours will not however hard they try and that is people with an open mind, The first thing Potsdam should do is to kick Ms Garner off of it as she is closed minded and will not let her past go, also she should recluse herself as she has reasons to vote it down and that would be the insurance she gets paid for by the village, Just a thought i hope the chairman Tim Connelly reads this,

Leave A Comment

(This will not be published)

(Optional)

Respond on Your Blog

If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.

Recent Comments

CitizenKandyKane said:

"Our candidate must be someone who can instinctively turn right to constitutional, conservative...

about Now Santorum's on top, in one poll

Anne Marie Corey said:

I, too, agree that this diagnosis rings true. Of course, ever medical avenue should be explored,...

about Conversion disorder IS a legitimate diagnosis

Seth said:

Norm I agree with you 100%. It is stupendlously stupid for people to be REQUIRED to buy...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns

sean said:

Respectfully Tom, you seem to forget that the President swore an oath to preserve, protect and...

about Obama expected to compromise on contraceptive issue

Norm said:

The last line in this page - you don`t make any sense, non what so ever, How many Millions...

about Supreme Court hearing on health-reform raises concerns