July 27, 2010 at 11:03am
Yesterday an odd press release from the National Republican Congressional Committee landed in my inbox.
To sum it up, the NRCC is going after Eric Massa for taking money from Congress Member Charlie Rangel, who's been brought up on charges by a House ethics committee. The press release faults Massa not returning "$74,000 in dirty campaign cash" he received from Rangel.
Massa should return all of his remaining campaign donations, not just Rangel's. But what's odd about the press release is the way it treats Massa. He halted his reelection bid early after he faced allegations about his conduct. He later resigned in a spectacularly odd display that he capped off with an appearance on the Glenn Beck Show.
The NRCC, however, attacks Massa as if he's in office or seeking office. From the e-mail:
"‘While approximately $588,000 in Rangel contributions have already been returned [by other Congress members and candidates],it appears that Eric Massa has no problem with aligning himself with Charlie Rangel and his notorious ethics problems,' said NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain. ‘Massa's refusal to cough up every penny of his tainted $74,000 is a slap in the face to the New York taxpayers who voted him into office. Massa is clearly just a typical Washington politician who is happy to fill his campaign account with dirty money while refusing to hold his party accountable for their tarnished record.'"
The GOP must be trying to get a bump off of the Rangel probe. That's the only rationale I can think of for this press release.

The dip in unemployment rate is temporarily and its cooked for election 2012 , after election...
"The road to Hell"? Is that one of those old Bing Crosby and Bob Hope pictures?
Go Newt indeed - the Democratic party's dream! I especially love the ad featuring the kids* from...
Mr. Obama was NOT vetted properly and neither is Mr. Romney, since I cannot find stories about...
There is no net benefit to south shore residents. According to the IJC raparians wil see and...
Comments for "Confusing e-mail of the week" (0)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these reviews. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove reviews at their discretion.
No comments have been posted. Be the first and add one below.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.