Thank you for your continuous coverage of Ren Square. As an admirer of the arts, I enjoy seeing productions at Geva, the Eastman, and the Auditorium. Why would anyone want to tear up downtown to build another theater? As both the Eastman and the Auditorium have been renovating, it makes no sense to spend money and destroy an entire block of Main Street.
As an older student at the Damon Center in the former Sibley Building, I admire the use of this building. There is comfort in seeing our former department store used by students.
If the aim of Ren Square is to provide construction jobs, can these not come from other projects? It would be nice to have retail, but cannot the plans for Midtown Plaza cover this? I hope those on the committee for this project review the cost and the aim. I have met no one in favor of tearing up downtown for an uncertain future.
M. ROMSON, ROCHESTER





Comments for "REN SQUARE: Why build a new theater?" (1)
City Newspaper is not responsible for the content of these comments. City Newspaper reserves the right to remove comments at their discretion.
sandy robinson said on Nov. 29, 2008 at 3:52am
Recently, I had a sudden idea about Renaissance Square, that took shape after I heard about a series of seemingly unrelated events: 1) New York State has warned BOCES teachers of preschool special-needs children that funding for those programs will be cut within two years; 2) a cousin's attention-challenged and behaviorly troubled teenage son has cut his first CD, a musical journey that reflects the emotions and thoughts that he otherwise has been unable to express; and that has given him and his parents the confidence and hope that he will have a fulfilling and giving life; and 3) funding is under way for a Renaissance Square performing arts center, despite continued community disagreement about the best use of the space, especially in light of debilitating economic times. So: I propose that the space be reframed as a creative and performing arts school for special-needs children, including those of preschool age; in effect, it would be a school driven by special education and therapeutic arts, such as dance-movement; painting and drawing; writing; and musical composition and performance. By its nature, the school would include a substantial performance and exhibit center, where local and visiting professional performance groups and visual artists could not only hold public concerts and exhibitions, but could provide special workshops for the students.
Who would benefit from this use of Renaissance Square? Families with special-needs children; the children who have much to offer, yet quickly are being relegated to and assured of lives of hopelessness and hardship; a Rochester community in need of a communal cause; teachers whose talents and motivation are underused and under-respected; and professional artists, who themselves understand struggle and the need for a community of support.
Those in favor of the Renaissance Square theater would not lose out at all; their vision ultimately could be re-envisioned as one that includes a wider population, a marginalized population... a population that they could be proud to support with the same funds they seek now. With a name like "Renaissance," would not a rebirth--a re-creation, a re-imagining--of the proposed theater space be apt? And most significantly, the threatened rights and dreams of children and groups most in need of economic, community and educational would be reborn.
Leave A Comment
Respond on Your Blog
Create an Account
or
Login
If you have a City Account you can not only post comments, but you can also respond to articles in your own City Blog. It's just another way to make your voice heard.