ENVIRONMENT: Planning is fascist
On May. 6th, 2008
Journal's "Sacrifice? Who, us?" April 23). Can it be so? You actually bash the selfish notion of individual rights, while promoting more government planning - both very fascist elements. And how can you honestly talk about how much we are wasting and polluting? We live in an era of incredible cleanliness and efficiency, compared to when Earth Day was originated; or weren't you alive back then, and therefore are almost excusably ignorant of the difference between now and then? And free men and women, unfettered by your loathsome government planners, will continue to provide more efficient and clean environments. This is arguably something that your government planners are incapable of.
But of course, the idea of making people walk and squishing them together in densely populated, and hence more polluted, areas, is so tantalizing to the new fascists.
The solution to the energy problem is more nuclear power and modern, efficient coal-burning power plants. But these don't fit into the larger Greenie scheme of a crippled society, managed by more and more government, and fewer and fewer individual rights.
BRAD GILLESPIE, WEBSTER






User Comments
Here is what others say about this article. City Newspaper isn't responsible for the content of comments.
Ted Christopher on May 12th, 2008
Without relevant numbers you can't do anything worthwhile here. At the time of the first Earth Day (1970) the US had a population of 205 million and our annual energy consumption was 67.8 quads (or quadrillion BTUs). That translates to a per million-capita consumption rate of 0.331 quads per million Americans. In 2005 the numbers were 296.4 million people using 99.9 quads annually. This translates to 0.337 quads consumed annually per million Americans. No net efficiency improvement.
By the latest data Germans use energy at a per capita rate which is only 0.516 the rate at which we use it. This despite their having an autobahn. Americans are doing miserably in the smart energy use department and the results are very significant.