SO FILLING IN OUR INNER LOOP HELPS US HOW??? SO THEY CAN PUT MORE BEAUTY PROJECTS IN OUR CITY. WHERE ARE THE JOBS?? NEED JOBS TO PAY FOR THINGS. FUNDING BEAUTY PROJECTS WITH OUR TAX MONEY I RATHER FUND KIDS TO KEEP THEM IN SCHOOL SO THEY DONT END UP IN JAIL WHICH COSTS US MORE MONEY. THE IGNORANCE OF THE PEOPLE IN ROCHESTER AMAZES ME. ONLY IN ROCHESTER. AND YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE LEAVE.
To lorr: This newspaper is not and never has been funded by City Council or any other government body. We are an independent company owned by the two publishers and a diverse group of Rochester-area residents. Our funding comes from the sale of advertising.
Howard why is everything with you have to do with race??? white this and that its not about race its about money and class and control. lovely warren lies, dave gannt lies, and now adam mcfadden is proposing frisk and search at random?? is this cool with you because they are all black. i assure you this has nothing to do with race, it has to do with who has the purse strings, stop with the race crap!!!
The city newspaper is under city council rule. since the city newspaper is funded by the city council they are to lie and support these bully candidates. why would you write a piece on the green party only to mock them. Lovely Warren was caught lying about his her political contributor but that is okay. This white liberal paper needs to go. you only support who pays your bills. media is communism at its best!!
The know-nothing, elitist, dangerous, super-liberals at City Newspaper (whom, as far as I know, STILL, in 2013 don't have a single person of color on their reporting-staff, nor on their Editorial Board) had the intestinal fortitude, and unmitigated gall to write that: "Lori Thomas and Howard Eagle are knowledgeable and dedicated, but their combative style – for which neither apologizes – would cause serious problems on the school board."
If the thoroughly incompetent, tongue-in-cheekish, ineffective, bumps-on-a-log, entrenched, current, school board does not have "serious problems" --- it never will. In addition to being know-nothings, elitist, dangerous, and super-liberal --- the all-white City staff is also hypocritical. They tried hard to explain why two of the current, bumps-on-a-log, incompetents "deserve to be re-elected," and why apparently the third one doesn't, but their explanation falls woefully short regarding consistency, and logic. Everyone who is paying close attention knows that it's simply a matter of them preferring a familiar, palatable, soft-spoken, tongue-in-cheekish, go-along-to-get-along type black woman --- rather than the type who is quick to nicely tell super-liberals, and any other know-nothings, where to get off.
Since I see them as a big part of the problem, it's not very often that I agree with the Democrat and Chronicle's Editorial Board, especially regarding education issues. For example, their school board endorsement choices for the November 5th General Election is baffling (to say the least). However, I must agree wholeheartedly with one thing they wrote: "To endorse members of a board that oversees such a poorly performing district would be irresponsible, regardless of the individual strengths, talents and experience those members possess." AMEN!
So, not only are the all-white, know-nothing, elitist, dangerous, super-liberals at City Newspaper hypocritical, but in accordance with sound logic (provided by, of all the sources, the D&C's Editorial Board) --- they are also "irresponsible."
I'm certain that most people don't follow their recommendations, but since they don't have a clue about what / who is needed on then Board of Education, and/or in general --- both groups really ought to get out of the endorsement-business --- just as a matter of principle, which would give them more time to do a better job of objectively reporting, as opposed to influencing, and making news.
This is what you wrote:
As Warren has noted repeatedly, Rochester is very much two communities: one is "growing, prosperous, and has a bright future." The other, "often invisible Rochester," she says, "is characterized by high rates of unemployment, crime, poverty, and despair."
The residents of both of those communities – but particularly those of the poorest and most vulnerable – need and deserve the best mayor possible. We remain convinced that Tom Richards is that person
Pardon me!!! Did I hear you right? Last time I checked, Mr. Richards has been our mayor for over 4 yours now. If he is the best mayor possible as you tend to believe, why, then, ‘’Rochester is, still, very much two communities’’.
Mayor Richards may be a good manager but not good enough to solve this city problems. Definitely, he is lacking of vision needed to solve the difficult situation of our city. Therefore, the citizens of Rochester need to move on, and elect the best candidate between the two competitors who are actively campaigning. I know Lovely Warren is the better fit for this job. I don’t need to list her qualifications because you already did.
Thus, I am calling the citizens of Rochester to confirm the choice that democrats made last September and elect Lovely Warren as our next mayor. DON'T ALLOW YOURSELF TO MISS THE BOAT THAT WILL MAKE HISTORY. ELLECT OUR FIRST FEMALE MAYOR.
Kathryn Quinn Thomas - That the voters selected Warren over Richards in last month's Democratic primary in no way, shape, or form precluded City from again endorsing Richards IF he had chosen to continue his campaign as a third party candidate as he had every right to do.
But the point that City, Richards’ cronies and hangers-ons, and now, possibly even Richards himself, are ignoring is that Richards WITHDREW from the campaign and threw his support to Warren
"I am announcing today that I am ending my campaign for reelection. ..."I believe that my announcement today will, and should mean that Lovely Warren will be elected our next Mayor. I intend to work to make that occur successfully and I urge everyone to do so as well.”
There are no second thoughts or do-overs after this kind of announcement..
An honorable man would keep his word and stay out of the race. An honorable newspaper would demand that he do so and would castigate and not endorse any back sliding.
We’ll have to wait and see where honor lies in Rochester politics.
When a non partisan newspaper endorses a political canidate it should be viewed as journalistic suicide.
His proposal of giving jobs to students in the summer and paying them for going to school is intriguing and leads to the questions: Who's going to pay for it all? The city that can barely keep itself afloat? The school district that wastes money like it's water? His heart is in the right place but you need to use your head to run a city.
We may never agree on this but lets take a look at just what you say. The small investment you refer to is Midtown town and it comes with $8.7 million of city money and $6 million of state money. There is the Sibley building which we have already give $1 million to build a police station, and a $3.1 million loan. They are also seeking long term tax breaks and millions more in loans/ grants to rehab this building. No study shows the need for a new downtown hotel and presently we have a surplus of rooms so the Hilton does not make economic sense and the Inner loop fill is is $7 million more of our money with $17.7 million from the federal government. When this is completed what will we have 300 or so more apartments downtown, 14 acres of shovel ready space no one is wants, 2.5 million square feet of vacant commercial space and we will be more than $41 million poorer. Will poverty be decreased? Will the many underemployed have better careers? Will crime be lower? Downtown will look nicer but will it be better? If you think there will be taxes out of this I ask you to look at 454 Westfall Rd an apartment complex which is worth $4.1 million and yet pays $1268 in taxes even though this building was built in 1972. It seems these tax breaks never expire as in 20 years these projects will need something done which will justify extending the tax breaks. My problem is I look at this as an investment and I see neither a monetary return nor a public benefit return so I see no reason to spend this money trying to recreate a downtown which is gone.
Sorry, City, but this endorsement is a smack in the face to all the voters who chose Lovely Warren. Liberals (and I am one) are often considered intellectual elitists--this is elitism at its finest. Who are you to decide that their votes don't count?
Ben Lewis....Your comments about White and city council mean you are forever resigned to the staus quo and that is sad. I always believe something better than what we currently have is possible but only if we stop voting the way we always vote. I also believe that if elected officials have good ideas that the people like and support everyone else...city council...would need to follow the voice of the people.
What part of this statement did City Newspaper not understand...?
"I am announcing today that I am ending my campaign for reelection. This is exclusively a personal decision driven by personal circumstances. My family has been dealing for some time with a difficult health challenge for one of our members that has recently evolved to the point where continuing my campaign is no longer appropriate.
. I am not sure that I have always made the correct decision, but I believe that I am doing so this time.
"I believe that my announcement today will, and should mean that Lovely Warren will be elected our next Mayor. I intend to work to make that occur successfully and I urge everyone to do so as well. After the election, my administration will work to assist in the transition. I believe that this is in the best interest of our city.”
- Mayor Thomas Richards, Sept. 18, 2013
Tom Janowski - Experience and ideas (preferably good ideas) ARE important. But in Rochester city politcs so is a working relationship between the mayor and city council (even though in past years the council has done little except rubber stamp the hair-brained schemes of Johnson, Duffy and Richards).
If by divine intervention White were elected mayor he would still have no personal or political relationship with the council nor, as an outsider, would the council see any reason to cooperate with someone with no Democratic party power behind him. Oh yeah, there is that old line about working for the benefit of the people, but that clearly comes in a distant second to party loyalty in this town.
the city is doomed under these failed leaders.
There is an ad on TV that says if you do the same old, same old, you're going to get the same old, same old. We have been getting the same old, same old for too long. It is time for change, for new ideas. Overthrow the dominant Paradigm! We need change to improve our City! City Newspaper has failed in that they limit their openness to change. Choosing a person who has stated that has said they are not running for as the ideal candidate is absurd.
Experience is not a magical quality that makes one candidate great. Lack of experience does not mean a candidate is unworthy of a vote. Ideas and fresh thinking are important too.
Many thought Bill Johnson was an experinced leader but he is the one who brought the disasterous fast ferry to Rochester. Experience didn't seem to help in that situation.
OK, the casino proposition has gotten some play in the media (especially the gov and lej's shenanigans), the prop on the Adirondack land swap has been mentioned in the D&C, and I've recieved a flyer in the mail about the one that eliminates the mandatory retirement age for judges, but what are the other three?
Counting on City to enlighten me....
I am disappointed in this article. Endorsing somebody who has dropped out of the race is counterproductive. Warren is the only candidate with definitive policies available to the public. (lovelyformayor.com/issues has links to PDFs I believe.) And this article references her countering RCSD's efforts. Clearly this newspaper failed to review the stats on our beloved district. Lol
City Newspapers does not endorse Green Party Candidates after they write good things about us. They say City Council has more experience but they don't listen to the residents of the city and they vote 9-0 on mostly every proposal made by the Mayor. At City Council meetings they have already made their decisions before the concerned citizens get their opportunity to express their concerns. Twenty minutes after they listen to the citizens they make their vote without any discussion or any concern for the taxpayers.
Website powered by Foundation