Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: News Blog
Re: “Police chief responds to problems with city's red-light camera program”
Define deception: " . . . a whole lot of people are not stopping for lights,” - Its more than a definition of Fairness when the angle of the camera isn't the 'Won-by-a-Nose Angle' and the Red Light has been Red Only for one-tenth of a second after a Yellow Light that lasted for roughly 3 seconds. Its not just the Yellow is too short the Green is Variable and makes driving dangerous. The vast bulk of these Red Light Robo-Tickets aren't folks that Clearly Ran A Red Light! These Robo-Cam Red-Light contraptions are an Ugly Festering Painful Reminder that Capitalism's Greed and Corporations have Taken Over our Once Great Country.
Re: “Lej committee blocks gun proposal”
The best way to keep guns out of buildings is to declare them 'gun free zones' and put up signs stating as such. It works in schools, doesn't it?
Re: “[UPDATED] Hey, state comptroller, tell us something we don't know”
Has anyone noticed that all of the measures taken by the city involve screwing workers? There's no talk about taxing huge projects fairly or maybe to stop giving away so much in tax breaks and low-interest loans to out of town developers. Why isn't anyone calling the Mayor and City Council on this?
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
So he's wearing a big curly wig. He's not speaking in any dialect that could be mocking anyone. I used to hate those old 'Irond-a Quoit-a' Dodge commercials with 'Vinnie' and 'Angelo'. Talk about stereotyping. But everyone seemed OK with that.
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
On the topic of offensive TV ads, what about the incredibly tastless Time Warner spot in which a zombie is shot in the head with an arrow splattering blood across a door? Great family viewing for the kiddies to watch again and again and again and again.
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
All of their stuff is junk. If not offensive, just truly tasteless. Kind of like, "really, you wanna' go there?". Why not just put on black face. Shakin' my head.
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
I don't think so. I think it's a bad joke though. "White guy basketball player with an afro" was funny when it was in Fletch in 1986. Now, it's a dated joke. Seriously, how prevalent is the blown out afro anymore? As sloppy as it looks, it's almost like parody of "white guy basketball player with an afro".
However, I think reflecting on this kind of stuff IS important and it is to be expected. This country is moving in a post racial phase. We can debate the speed at which it is happening. but it is happening. We shouldn't be afraid to ask ourselves whether something is racist. Just as we shouldn't be afraid to make a distinction between cultural insensitivity and cultural humor.
Asking if something is offensive is not the same as being offensive.
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
Seriously? You're offended by that?
Since now the simple wearing of a black fright wig is going to get you labelled a racist? There was NO use of any "hot words", no fake "ebonic" accent, nothing at all but one guy wearing an exaggeratedly curly wig. It wasn't exactly tightly "Afro," it was loose.
Had there been any sort of other loaded references or terms, I might be with you, but to be offended by that AND to bring it to the public's attention in this way just screams "knee-jerk liberal" as well as over-the-top political correctness.
At some point you just gotta let it go. It's not like they are known for Cleo-winning, slickly-produced, well-thought-out ads. It's quick, cheap ads done almost amateurishly. Due to the sheer number of ads they produce every year, somewhere there's going to be something you don't like. Wait a week or two... they'll move on to some other dumb, loud ad.
Re: “Is Fuccillo ad offensive?”
which one? There are a few horribly produced commercial spots on their website...
Re: “[UPDATED] Hey, state comptroller, tell us something we don't know”
"The report also points out the disparity in the amount of aid Rochester gets from the state compared to the other three “Big Four” cities"
Not to worry - That's why we sent the Honorable Mr. Bob Duffy to Albany. No doubt he's hot on the case... right?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4zyjLyBp64
Re: “If MCC flops, will city taxpayers be on the hook?”
Just curious about the deal for the city to build a police substation in Sibley? How much is that costing the city? The mayor is certainly ensuring that Winn profits from Rochester and Monroe County any way he can. He put the substation there and now is trying to strong arm a COUNTY entity to contribute to Winn’s bottom line. My perception is my reality and right now my perception is that some sketchy deals are taking with the mayor and Winn.
Re: “If MCC flops, will city taxpayers be on the hook?”
Clint
Understanding that the original deal with RochWil, the Wilmot’s shell company, was struck by Mayor Ryan many years ago, I’ve always found it interesting that the local media have steadfastly refused to demand answers from the Johnson and Duffy administrations as to what actions, if any, they took to mitigate the fact that RochWil was millions of dollars in arrears in payments to the city and getting further behind every day.
Considering that Mayor Richards was the city’s corporation counsel from 2006 -2010 perhaps this re-election season would be an appropriate time to ask Hizzoner exactly what he did to try and collect on the unpaid loans. Certainly Richards should want to clear up any suspicion that backroom deals might have resulted in millions of dollars being left unrecovered by the city.
Re: “Cuomo vs. the IDA's”
It's too bad that New York's taxes are so high that businesses needs tax breaks to be enticed to come here. Despite Cuomo's much-touted 'NY Open for Business' campaign nothing has changed. New York is as business-unfriendly as ever.
Re: “If MCC flops, will city taxpayers be on the hook?”
I am sorry, but this is not a story about MCC and it's location, it is a story of a back room deal with an out of town developer! Tom Wilmot did not pay the city the money he owed for the Sibley building. Richards worked with Winn development, a Boston developer to take the building off Wilmot's hands. (note to City newspaper, did Wilmot receive any money when he owed the city over 20 million?) Richards is carrying the water of Winn and trying to force MCC to stay in the unsafe Sibley building location to the developer's benefit, not our kids!
Sadly, Tom Richards, like many lawyers, see the deal, not the people that are involved! That is why he sold RG&E and we lost our utility and many jobs while paying more for electricity...and he made over 10 million. He is a product of and a champion of the "deal" getting done. So, if our children are in an unsafe Sibley building, so what?
I have a daughter who went to MCC. I am a city resident and pay taxes. I believe Wilmot should be sued, MCC should be allowed to move to wherever they think they can protect the students and educate them best, Winn should not have the Mayor carrying their water, and Tom Richards should focus on collaboration in our community. (oh, and enforcing tax collection against millionaire contributors)
Re: “If MCC flops, will city taxpayers be on the hook?”
And why do city taxpayers pay more Mr. Mayor? Do more MCC students reside in the city than in any other municipality? That's why it's called a "community" college.
It would be nice if the Mayor, County Dems, and now Joe Morelle would quit playing politics and start being honest with themselves and their constituents - Instead they seem more concerned with an out-of-state developer's already sizable bank account.
How about recognizing the fact that MCC students (most of which ARE constituents by the way) need and deserve a campus they can be proud of - One that allows for full immersion in study - Not an awkwardly retrofitted, former department store with a mishmash of other uses and random members of the public wandering about.
I'm also trying to wrap my head around this one: If Sibley actually requires a police substation to ensure safety, is that really a place we ought to be sending college students???
Re: “If MCC flops, will city taxpayers be on the hook?”
And at the top of the list of flops that put city taxpayers on the hook... Bill Johnson's Fast Ferry. Mayor Johnson (remember him, the guy who said that those who opposed the ferry would be apologizing to him six months after it began service?) bought the barge at auction after it had already failed its inaugural year, and he and the other backers the project all swore that it also could survive on its own steam. Mayor Richards is to be applauded for his reluctance to travel down this well worn path of financial failure trod by so many civic and media boosters in the past.
Re: “Shale gas drilling moratorium proposed in Assembly”
The shale oil and gas boom is by far the best economic news Americans have heard in years, bringing enormous benefits from tens of thousands of high-wage jobs, to true energy independence, to a comeback of chemical manufacturing and other industries that had been offshored.
For New York State's political elite to screw up this once-in-a-generation opportunity at our doorstep would be a shameful, despicable, and immoral act.
Re: “Shale gas drilling moratorium proposed in Assembly”
Anything that delays fracking in NY is a good thing in my opinion. Delays leading to a ban in the entire state of New York would be my ultimate goal.
Re: “Lej committee blocks gun proposal”
If legislators want to allow law-abiding citizens to carry weapons openly in government buildings, that is their prerogative. If some nut with a gun manages to get inside and cause mayhem, that's their responsibility as well. Let them have it.
Re: “Police chief responds to problems with city's red-light camera program”
I have to side with Sheppard on this one, more or less.
The "less' is that this current problem would probably have been detected, identified, explained and resolved sooner were the red light cameras and the ticketing process operated by city employees out of the Public Safety Building rather than by some sleazy out-of-town company.
The "more" is the fact that the fines imposed for running red lights are no less legitimate than the fines imposed on speeding tickets, parking tickets or any other traffic violation. Does the city make a few bucks? Of course. Do they make a few bucks on ALL traffic and parking fines? Of course. So do we dispense with these laws or alter the manner in which they are enforced simply because the city makes a few bucks? Of course not. Bottom line. You break the law, you get fined.
Oh yeah, by the way, I've been nailed and fined by one of these cameras for running a red light. But apparently I'm the only recipient of such a ticket willing to admit that I was guilty as hell.