Everyone in Charlotte assumes that the one on the side of Steel River is Karl Marx. I've never known Charlotte to ever have been a fishing village, but I could be wrong.
If you want to see the books out from under glass, you can arrange a private showing with Anita Wahl, 428-8050.
The problem I have is although Art is fantastic. Some of those properties are being marketed for outside investment. Some outside investors look at Art as Graffiti or blight because they just do. Investors equal jobs and expansion of the tax base. By contributing to the perception of blight you may be inadvertently adversely effecting the very community you wish to promote. I am sorry for that as I like Art myself. I also like jobs and schools that have the resources to properly educate our children about the Arts. Just a thought.....
I think you need some more hashtags in the photo captions ... :)
The paintings are located on one building at the Atlantic and Greenleaf intersection, with one (by Peeta) about a block away on Atlantic just after the railway overpass. You'll definitely see them!
Where is a straightforward list of the locations/addresses for 2014 Writes of Spring murals?! Not here, not on the Wall Therapy website. Thx.
It is curious that the City has had several articles about guests in my studio (Niraj Lama and Imran Aslam) without ever interviewing the artist who owns the studio.
Kuma Gama - Clay Studio
Hungerford Building Suite #228
I like most of these, but can we put the kibash on any more creepy black-and-white skeletal animals like the 69ing rats and vulture-thing on the Genesee River Trail?
Nothing brings style to a neighborhood like a beautiful wall mural. Nice work!
At the risk of being labeled a philistine by Rochester’s self-appointed cultural mavens, my I express my hope that a bolt of lightning (or at least a few hundred pigeons) will soon take care of this latest of Paley’s metallic (metallICK?) monstrosities?
This is the best art thing going on in the city this year.
Something similar is happening on walls in Buffalo's Allentown District, which is similar to our Neighborhood of the Arts. I have lots of more ideas for wall murals and traffic singal box paintings in the city and maybe in the suburbs as well.
Our city is being transformed by these surprises of color and creativity happening in the most drab unexpected little corners. It's wonderful.
Will the MAG be inviting Tom Otterness back to town so he can slaughter another dog as his contribution to street "art".
I would like to thank the folks responsible for Wall Therapy. Some of the most respected and well-known wall muralists in the world now have traveled to our city and shared their work. They see Rochester as a destination to meet their peers from around the world and share ideas and fellowship, as evidenced by the fact that many have made repeat visits from very distant places to participate. They have purposefully chosen some of the most challenged neighborhoods in our city to beautify and create inspiration. They have given many of our city's most talented local artists an opportunity to both share their work in highly visible venues, and to be included in the global media attention that the event has achieved. They have encouraged an atmosphere of diversity and free expression, of joy and community. They achieved this through grassroots support and hard work, and financed it through the contributions of folks who understand Wall Therapy's value. The barking of a small handful of critics cannot change these facts.
Having the privilege of seeing artists create...watching bare and barren spaces be transformed into vibrant surfaces...encouraging the public to explore and participate...Two thumbs up, Wall Therapy. Thanks, Rebecca.
In the Spirit of conversation Gingerbeard did propose an Idea for a Mural to be done in Wheatpaste or Paint. The Idea was Fredrick Douglas with one of his famous quotes ." It is easier to build strong children then to repair broken men." This Idea was proposed to be done in the south wedge being that Fredrick Douglas himself lived right on south avenue.
I'd personally like to thank all that have taken the time to respond and discuss this matter further. From Rebecca Rafferty who has written an amazing article and an equally well written response. To Mr. Jack Russell for vocalizing his concerns over the project and what it's impact could be on the Rochester area. We as a community can never hope to improve if we don't hear all the sides of a discussion, and willing to understand others views. So thank you to all for taking the time to write in.
If it helps, I'd just like to take a moment to address the point that Jack Russell made in his last message: "That doesn't mean the mural project is all wrong; however, I think people who back it should be aware of the negative side and be more prepared to accommodate those who feel adversely affected -- not simply vilify those who are not happy with what's going on."
The crew and supporters of this endeavor have taken that into account and have brought in some very talented people to handle all aspects of the public relations for the entire week (and beyond if necessary). They literally have a small team of people busily working away answering questions, in person and online, and listening to any and all concerns regarding the murals being created and the artists creating them. Rest assured that there will not be any vilification or negative/libelous statements directed at anyone from our crew, we respect those who have different opinions than us, with the understanding that we wish to be offered the exact same respect when offering our own opinion.
For instance, I myself have been out in the community at all the mural locations taking time to talk with onlookers to get their opinions and to listen to any concerns they might have. I'm happy to say that the number of individuals upset or worried were practically non-existent. The few that were worried not only were happy to discuss the matter, but were shocked when the artists themselves took time from their murals to discuss the matter. The Wall\Therapy team and the artists have the utmost respect for Rochester and it's citizens, and we hope that this shows through to any and all who wish to discuss the matter any further.
Should you wish to discuss anything over with the crew you can find the contact information via the website, or send them a message on any of the social media outlets like twitter or Facebook.
Oh my, I guess I'm glad to have stirred up some discussion. The odd thing is that in most matters I'd probably be on the side of the people who dislike my comment. At any rate, real discussion seems healthy. I'll certainly reconsider my views and where they are coming from. But I would ask those who don't like what I'm saying to examine yourself (as some are saying I should do with the murals) to see why objections like mine bother you. And if you can imagine these views that disturb or irritate you being distilled into a slogan that you didn't just get to think about briefly but had to see scrolling across your screen on a regular basis, you might get an idea of how someone could have trouble living with challenging art on their once soothing blank walls.
Unlike provocative books, movies and museum art, murals are out there. Some of the people who are bothered by them (or who LIKE seeing them but not living with them on a daily basis!!) have had their choice about when and how frequently they encounter the art taken away. This is a serious issue for all public art.
The starting point for my comment was Paul Goldberg's letter, published in the 7/24 City. And the fact that I love blank walls -- which are seldom really blank but full of character, and history, and evidence of random elemental processes, etc. But let's consider Goldberg and, yes, the many residents I expect he represents. Were they really brought into the process? Did they really have an opportunity to choose? Or was it a done-deal that just needed a certain amount of going through the motions?
At any rate, isn't there a temptation toward personal imperialism whenever one thinks one knows what's best to put up in someone else's environment, whether it's billboards or art or security forces (I am not saying these are equivalents). The arrogance I referred to was not the art or the artists but in the project sponsor's ridiculing those who legitimately objected. It's perhaps spiritually useful but nonetheless truly patronizing to tell people that if they don't enjoy seeing something they should examine themselves. I don't like seeing a Walmart, or even an art museum, being built on a former farm or natural area. I can examine myself to see why, I can acknowledge my own destructive tendencies and so on, but the development is still going to strike me as wrong.
Here we have murals that some love and some hate. Not to recognize the validity of the objections from people like Mr. Goldberg, to see objections as inherently small-minded or anti-creativity or on the other side... to have no compassionate awareness of the negative aspect of this -- even if you know in your bones celebration is the larger, greater response -- that seems as limited a mindset as the other side supposedly displays.
But, yeah, discussion is good, and dialogue, and developing a porosity of mind that can truly consider all sides. I'm always learning. I do not know Mr. Goldberg, but I imagine he would find common cause with and be able to have fun with many of the mural proponents and artists, and I expect he could be a strong ally in the fight against the cultural, political, and moral decay some comments refer to... But one's visual environment can be important, and some great people value calm and simplicity more than provocation in their everyday surroundings. I think he's legitimately pissed off, and not for stupid reasons. That doesn't mean the mural project is all wrong; however, I think people who back it should be aware of the negative side and be more prepared to accommodate those who feel adversely affected -- not simply vilify those who are not happy with what's going on.
p.s. I agree that a lot of by-committee public art -- most of it! -- is horrible and at least some of the mural art is wonderful. There's no easy truth here about what's right and wrong, good and bad.
p.s. 2 The implication -- made by one writer -- that not accepting a potentially disturbing large artwork in your neighborhood has anything to do with one's awareness of cultural disintegration and corporate take-over, or one's personal efforts to face and fight what's happening in the world... is preposterous. And highly counter productive if you really want to make the world more democratic and humane.
I walked down part of the El Camino Trail from Irondequoit this morning. My intention was to see the art, which I did. But what really made me feel good were the three different people also wandering around who engaged me, happy to see the artists in their neighborhood.
Website powered by Foundation