Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

The City NSC offices have quads where Beechwood is considered the Southeast. See here: http://www.cityofrochester.gov/maps/

Posted by Pam on 04/17/2013 at 12:07 PM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

I disagree with you about Rory McCann playing the Hound. He was particularly effective in Blackwater (Season 2 Ep 9), both in his encounter with Sansa in her chambers and with Joffrey and Tryrion in the battle. I'm not sure how much more "menacing" he can be than when he tells Sansa that "All men are killers..."

Is there a particular actor you believe who could do better?

Posted by Curt Shannon on 04/17/2013 at 10:43 AM

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

Hello again, Rochester Musician,

I should have been clearer: of course I know that geographically, Beechwood is in the northeast. But for purposes of the FIS program, it's part of Southeast Council member Elaine Spaull's district.

Thanks!
Chris Fien

Posted by Christine Carrie Fien on 04/17/2013 at 9:55 AM

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

Beechwood, in the southeast??? For real?? Maybe the city administration has some very odd views on what direction is which. Again according to the neighborhood association: "Beechwood is bordered to the North by Bay Street, to the East by Culver Road, to the South by East Main Street, and to the West by North Goodman Street."

So where is Marketview Heights? I checked the definition and it is "bounded on the west by North Street, on the east by North Goodman Street, on the north by Clifford Avenue and south at East Main Street."

Note that both of these neighborhoods are bounded on the south by East Main Street ...

Examining a map of Rochester, Beechwood is directly (and immediately) to the east of Marketview Heights. So please explain how Beechwood can remotely be considered southeast Rochester???

Posted by Rochester Musician on 04/17/2013 at 9:03 AM

Re: “What did Rhee know about cheating in DC schools?

Thanks ID for pointing that out.

Tim

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Tim Macaluso on 04/17/2013 at 8:43 AM

Re: “What did Rhee know about cheating in DC schools?

Tim, correction: Rhee did teach for three years - and there's a scandal there, too, regarding the testing results. That seems to have been hushed up, but her claims of her teaching excellence are suspect here as well. But Rhee had never been an assistant principal, a principal, a central administrator of any stripe (no directorship, assistant superintendent) - nada, zip - before being appointed chancellor at the age of 36.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Insatiable Dragon on 04/16/2013 at 6:29 PM

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

Rochester Musician,
I double checked with the city administration and they do indeed consider Beechwood the southeast.

Thanks!
Chris Fien
City news editor

Posted by Christine Carrie Fien on 04/16/2013 at 5:14 PM

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

Ummmm ... Beechwood is in the northeast, not the southeast ... in fact, from the neighborhood association website: "Welcome to Beechwood, a dynamic and diverse neighborhood nestled in historic northeast Rochester."

So what is the targeted neighborhood in the southeast, since it obviously can't be Beechwood?

Posted by Rochester Musician on 04/16/2013 at 3:19 PM

Re: “Improving neighborhoods

Note to editor: Please run a find/replace on this article for the word investment. Replace it with sacrifice.

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Tom Kloppel on 04/16/2013 at 10:14 AM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

Thank you for the clarification on Podrick, folks. You're absolutely right. As soon as you mentioned that he's still with Brienne (well, so far as we know, as that story ended on a hell of a cliffhanger) the rest of Pod's journey snapped into focus in my mind.

Allanon, interesting tidbit about Martin instructing the show to change Melisandre. She's a fascinating character in both the books and the show, and personally I love her almost tragic irony. She is likely 100 percent right about her prophecy, and she's really trying to save the realm. She just bet on the wrong horse.

Posted by Eric Rezsnyak on 04/16/2013 at 8:48 AM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

Podrick Payne is still a major player. Patch Face was not cast or has not been listed as cast in any way. The producers said Melisandre's character has been altered under George Martin's instructions...

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by allanon on 04/16/2013 at 4:44 AM

Re: “[UPDATED] RPO challengers lose legal battle

So the Children's Crusade is finally over. Too bad that the RPO board had to waste time and money defending itself from a glorified temper tantrum.

10 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by MJN on 04/15/2013 at 9:46 PM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

Cathy Pod make it to Book Four and maybe to five ( he is with Briena all the time) , and the one who captured Jaime and Briene are the Series is called Locke

http://gameofthrones.wikia.com/wik

i/Locke

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Damian Paredes Spiridonov on 04/15/2013 at 8:08 PM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

Hey Cathy, this is the first blog I've done for "Thrones." We added that and "Doctor Who" because, well, I wanted to. (The "Who" blog for the episode this weekend should be up first thing tomorrow; I was working Saturday night.) Glad you're following the blog!

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Eric Rezsnyak on 04/15/2013 at 2:33 PM

Re: “"Game of Thrones" Season 3, Episode 3: Let's give the boy a hand

Ok, stop the train. I haven't been paying attention and didn't realize you 'blogged' this show.' O Fraptious Day' etc

Kudos for remembering names and plots. Beyond me 'cept for a few faves.

In total agreement that I thought two scenes were beyond brilliant. The Small Council scene was so perfect. Love Tyrion. And then the post brothel moment between the Boys. And God Bless them for being concerned!

Posted by Cathy on 04/15/2013 at 1:42 PM

Re: “ART: Geva cancels summer show "The Lifeguard"

HI MJN,
I work for Geva and want to let you know that there is no more to the story than what we provided to the press. Forster never met with the playwright until Geva secured the rights to the show. He did express an interest in doing the show publicly but needed a producer like Geva to take it to the next step, Unfortunately, their schedules did not allow for a meeting until the days after we made our announcement. It was a meeting between the playwright and Mr Forster and then later a follow-up conversation with artistic director Mark Cuddy that lead to the writer rescinding the rights from Geva. There are currently no productions of THE LIFEGUARD currently planned any where . Geva does regret not being able to bring this new work and Mr Forster to our stage this summer.

Posted by Kevin Sean Sweeney on 04/15/2013 at 12:32 PM

Re: “Pittsford Y proposal comes down to cars

To John Peckham:
Thanks for your comment. I just checked in with YMCA of Greater Rochester officials for clarification. They tell me that the Southeast YMCA is the smallest suburban facility; the Monroe Avenue and Maplewood facilities are smaller. I'll be correcting the story so that this is clear.

Posted by Jeremy Moule on 04/15/2013 at 10:57 AM

Re: “Port work should begin this fall

This is the same "If we build it they will come" mentality that led Bill Johnson to put taxpayers in the dumper to the tune of tens of millions of dollars to pay (twice) for his absurd Fast Ferry day dream. Apparently our current mayoral administration is content to follow in Bill's footsteps. Sadly, the result will be identical. More wasted millions with the only result being a new collection of underutilized facilities to go along with the ferry terminal.

I don’t suppose the city bothered putting together a business case for the port project which Mr. Gregor would care to share with the public?

Posted by MJN on 04/15/2013 at 7:18 AM

Re: “Pittsford Y proposal comes down to cars

Smaller than the Monroe Y? I think not. I find the statement by "Y officials" to be disingenuous. I love the Southeast Y and in it's current location I think it's the most outdoor-runner-friendly Y in the area. It's adjacent to the Canal Path @ Mitchell Road and puts you onto decent neighborhood roadways that runners of many levels of expertise can enjoy, from flat to some serious hills. While I sympathize with the Y on this, the proposed location won't offer outdoor-running Y-members nearly as many SAFE opportunities. They've already built an east-side Taj Mahal facility on Rt. 250. Is a second ginormous east-side facility really necessary?

0 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by John Peckham on 04/14/2013 at 1:58 PM

Re: “All creatures great and small

They forgot to mention many great services. When you are going to list services, a thorough list should be provided.

Posted by Lost Dog on 04/13/2013 at 1:31 PM

Top Viewed Stories


© 2013 City Newspaper

Website powered by Foundation