Narrow Search

  • Show Only

  • Category

  • Narrow by Date

    • All
    • Today
    • Last 7 Days
    • Last 30 Days
    • Select a Date Range

Comment Archives: stories: News & Opinion: Urban Journal

Re: “The urban balancing act: residents vs. developers

No one wants useless parking lots. No one is against development in Charlotte. It needs to be THOUGHTFUL development and not what Edgewater Resources and the mayor is foisting upon the residents.

Housing at the waterfront does nothing for the average visitor. The land should not be sold to a private developer. Its use for the 2.8 acre spot should focus on providing something for visitors -- not for the profits of a private developer (especially one with little experience).

17 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by SaveCharlotteNow.com on 06/04/2014 at 6:44 PM

Re: “The urban balancing act: residents vs. developers

Martin, I think the overall point is clear: Mayor Warren is faced with three major "neighborhood" issues, that residents in each of those neighborhoods are rightly concerned about, and has an opportunity to make good on campaign promises.

6 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by J on 06/04/2014 at 1:21 PM

Re: “The urban balancing act: residents vs. developers

I spent two hours walking around Charlotte on Sunday including walking the length of the Riverway trail from the cemetery to the beach. If that was the only view of Charlotte you had you might agree with your assertion that residents have 'worked hard' to preserve the area. But then I walked back along Lake and I saw dilapidated houses, two tattoo parlors, smoke shops, biker bars, boarded up buildings...and very little else.
The City did the heavy lifting involved in creating Turning Point Park and the Riverway Trail. Charlotte needs thoughtful development, not parking lots.
And it is completely illogical to compare the three development projects you mention. They are completely different. Rereading this piece I really don't understand your point beyond 'development bad, status quo good'.

9 likes, 13 dislikes
Posted by Martin Edic on 06/04/2014 at 9:41 AM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

Current levels of inequality are a direct result of Fed policies and trade deals, neither of which enjoy the support of the general public by a large margin - Left, Right, or Center. In short, they are a direct result of corrupt Government for sale to the highest bidder, both sides of the aisle. Only social issues separate the two major parties, and that has nothing to do with financial, trade or tax policy.

Most of the current stock market gains are a result of leveraged buy-backs on a grand scale, intended more to bolster executive compensation than any other reason.

Consider this, high levels of inequality are only a problem if you're at the bottom end of things. The economy is not broken, its working exactly as intended by those in a position to directly influence it.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Martin J on 06/02/2014 at 2:03 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

Perhaps Mitt Romney would have been the better choice. Prejudice against the super-rich CAN backfire. I just wish he paid higher taxes. He probably would've gotten more votes.

2 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Mike Bruton on 05/23/2014 at 2:03 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

the word "society" in todays world. well, when the 'well off' refer to the poor in a negative way they say "society" doesnt approve. For example, "society" is the 'well off 'and everyone else, the poor are not part of this "society" in fact it seems to mean that "society" are the total of the country and everyone else, the poor are not rteally citizens at all. Its what "society" thinks about the poor. They hate them and blame them for things. Blame the victims punish the victims. The poor are not seen as part of "society" Im not taking about the very rich, just the 'well off'. People who dont understand or know what its like to be poor. Maybe they are not meant to understand. But it set them apart. Segregates them. I think these people within the so called "society" are more socialiy isolated than the poor. The poor have to look after and care for the poor. No one else will. The poor should stop looking to the govenment or the rich to help them. They wont. As a poor person I have a "responsibility" to look out for other poor people. Coz I understand.

1 like, 2 dislikes
Posted by sonya ash pryor on 05/23/2014 at 12:14 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

Where's the justice in a former corporate lawyer and political spouse pulling down a cool five million dollars in the past year for "speaking" (something the rest of us do every day for nothing)? Yet this newspaper will ostentatiously champion her cause in 2016 and pronounce it a victory for wymynkind.

19 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by b.d.g. on 05/23/2014 at 9:40 AM

Re: “Segregation forever

Make Parents responsible for their Children. The Majority of the RCSD students have no Parental Control as determined by their behavior. Manners Respect and the difference between right and wrong are not being taught or enforced by the Parents of the children we are trying to educate. We need to segregate students who are unruly and spoil the RCSD for others. Special internment facilities were intensive education can be instilled on the Students who are not Educational because of faulty Parents. Remove the Parent out of the equation orif they chose accept a role in thier childrens education. Simple huh? If you cannot speak proper English how can you prepare your child to learn? If you do not teach your child manners then how are they going to be responsible citizens? Stop coddling the Parents. Hold them responsible for their failure as Parents. Why should we tolerate a segment of Society that refuses to be apart of our collective society and doesn't want to make any effort to improve themselves.

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Jimmy65 on 05/22/2014 at 3:43 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

By and large, the super-rich—from Buffett, to Wall Street, to the New York Times's billionaire owners, to Hollywood and Silicon Valley—are liberal Democrats who support the same causes and candidates the editorial writer does. Sometimes it's prudent to be careful what we wish for.

Contrary to the editorial, unfortunately, you do need some grasp of economics to make sense of Piketty’s theory and its flaws. Common sense will suffice, however, to recognize that the Obama regime's zeal in pandering to rich white environmentalist ideologues and other so-called "progressive" interests—let alone the health care debacle—has produced nothing but stagnation, joblessness, dependency, and misery.

18 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by b.d.g. on 05/21/2014 at 11:21 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

Well, under Obama rule the rich have gotten richer and the number of poor has swelled. Middle class shrank.

So....your solution is more of these same policies?

17 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by johnny on 05/21/2014 at 6:22 PM

Re: “The US, the super-rich, and the Great Society

The government has helped the 1% get where they are! The question is how people will react to the facts. Will they demand political action from our leaders!

3 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by joe on 05/21/2014 at 3:17 PM

Re: “Can anyone 'turn around' a Rochester high school?

Somebody who doesn't work, has very little education, hasn't been taught the difference between wrong and right by their single mother parent, and has children. Probably doesn't know that they should participate in their child's education. Until we fix the family we won't be able to fix the schools. Successive generations have proven this. We are bound to fail if we allow this to proceed.

We need shame school. Children whose parents fail to be involved in the education of their children should be segregated to special schools or containment facilities until the time that the parents teach their children manners courtesy and respect and show some level of involvement in their child's education so as to not spoil the whole system for those that properly raise their children. In my neighborhood the children that cause the most trouble are the children of Parents who make little or no effort to raise them. One more year until I have saved enough money to leave our city. I won't be looking back either. I will fire all my employees, sell all my properties and leave this god forsaken place.

1 like, 1 dislike
Posted by Jimmy65 on 05/19/2014 at 6:11 PM

Re: “Can anyone 'turn around' a Rochester high school?

Some would argue that, in addition to RCSD's 9-12 students being beyond educability, RCSD itself is beyond repair. Read about a couple of successful strategies for urban districts at http://www.thinkingaboutmomming.com/2014/0…

2 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Elizabeth Laidlaw on 05/15/2014 at 8:47 AM

Re: “Can anyone 'turn around' a Rochester high school?

Four part-time town councilors ask the Almighty to enlighten their deliberations, and to bestow blessings upon the town and townsfolk. No sect is established or disestablished, nobody's liberty is infringed -- and anybody who goes to the trouble of taking offense surely has way too much time on his hands! Oh, the unholy horror of it all!

The politicization of the federal courts began with the tidal wave of left-wing judicial activism throughout the 1960s and early 1970s, culminating in the fabrication of a supposed "right" to murder an unborn baby. Then in 1987, the abortion industry and its hard left extremist allies unleashed a savage full-on political assault against a superbly qualified Supreme Court nominee, Judge Robert Bork. More than anything else, it was this shameful campaign by the hard left that permanently damaged the integrity of the nomination process and the reputation of the Court. (It is absurd that the Liptak article fails to even mention this.)

8 likes, 7 dislikes
Posted by b.d.g. on 05/14/2014 at 10:41 PM

Re: “Can anyone 'turn around' a Rochester high school?

We need to have two teachers or a teaching assistant with every teacher in K-1 classrooms.

4 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by salmorejo on 05/14/2014 at 6:10 PM

Re: “Can anyone 'turn around' a Rochester high school?

You are right about starting earlier and almost every RCSD elementary school can use help because the students are behind. This only grows with age as the necessary intimacy between teachers and students goes away. But let it be known that the huge gaps kids enter kindergarten with can be overcome with focused, intensive, long-term and consistent intervention and enrichment. The district does none of these things with fidelity.
The keys grades for saving kids are 5-8. Most students, particularly minority males decide to give up or fight on during these grades. There are aligned factors the district could/should be monitoring to stop the eventual failure in high school but they don't.

7 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Gotta Say It on 05/14/2014 at 10:49 AM

Re: “Deconstructing Cuomo

" Cuomo is a social liberal, economic moderate, like Bill Clinton, who presided over the greatest peacetime expansion of the US economy in history. Clinton made Cuomo his Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. See the connections? Good. "--howard

Bill Clinton was fotunate enough to be president during the computer and internet boom that made many millionaires and billionaires, amd fortunately was to busy cheating on his wife to disrupt the economy.

Coumo was in charge of HUD, in which the housing colapse caused this whole mess of the last few years. Remember when banks were ordered to give mortgages to people who couldn't really afford them? And of course the banks and it's brokers were blamed for it all.

15 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by johnny on 05/08/2014 at 8:58 PM

Re: “Deconstructing Cuomo

You’re joking, right? Cuomo a ‘moderate’? If a politician walks, talks and acts like a liberal, he’s a liberal. Look at his agenda of things he’s supported: gay marriage, gun control with confiscation, free college degrees for prisoners, free tuition for illegal immigrants, income surcharge on ‘the rich’ and expanded abortion laws. He certainly leans to left although not quite as far as NY Mayor DeBlaisio. Cuomo promotes himself as a fiscal moderate, but despite all his talk about the “New New York” being “open for business” nothing has changed. NY is still the highest-taxed and most business-unfriendly state. And now we’ve just been pronounced the worst state to retire in. New York is number one! In all the worst categories. No wonder we also lead the nation in population loss.

19 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Bart on 05/08/2014 at 10:00 AM

Re: “Deconstructing Cuomo

Last one to leave New York State, please turn out the light.

19 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by b.d.g. on 05/07/2014 at 6:15 PM

Re: “Deconstructing Cuomo

No, Cuomo is a liberal. Not by the "progressive" label people like to throw around. Nor is Obama a "progressive." He's a liberal. Gay marriage? Passed. Temporary surcharge on higher incomes? Passed. Sweeping gun control law? Passed. Women's Equality Act? Failed due to Republican interference. The problem is too many of NY's Democrats are so-called "progressives" who believe in taxing everyone to the Stone Age. Higher taxes, no jobs is not progressive. It is regressive and unfair. Cuomo is a social liberal, economic moderate, like Bill Clinton, who presided over the greatest peacetime expansion of the US economy in history. Clinton made Cuomo his Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. See the connections? Good.

5 likes, 14 dislikes
Posted by howard on 05/07/2014 at 2:53 PM

Top Viewed Stories


© 2015 City Newspaper

Website powered by Foundation