Narrow Search

Comment Archives: stories: Special Sections

Re: “ENDORSEMENTS: City Council and school board

In response to.....statement “(I)well intentioned but don't have the strength and insight necessary for the board." I would like to share more information about my work experience and community involvement. I have been in Management for 17 years, and have worked as a senior level manager for 4 years. As a senior level manager, I have to ensure that we are in compliance in all fiscal areas (budget, taxes, payroll…etc.). I work with a diverse and growing workforce, and I serve the members of the community who patronize our establishments.

In addition to my work in management, I have also served as a parent representative of the Rochester City School District's Audit Committee, where we assist the board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities for audit, internal control, and financial reporting processes. I am also the only person running in this election who has served on a board of directors for a successful education establishment (Geneses Community Charter School). I, reluctantly, did not seek reelection due to my desire to run for the Rochester City School Board. I felt that I would not be able to give my all while campaigning and working a full time job.
Also, as a parent advocate, who has worked with many of the children and parents of the Rochester City School District whom the Parent Advisory Council, the Office of Parent Engagement, and many school board members have neglected, I have a complete understanding of the issues that our district is facing and a solution-based platform to address these problems.

As a result of all of my experiences, I have interacted with every level employee of the Rochester City School District up to and including Dr. Vargas. I have offered viable solutions to address the many complex issues that our district is currently facing. We have low morale (from parents, students, teachers, building administrators and central office) due to an inept leadership, a lack of student achievement, and a lack of parent engagement.

This is a board that has continuously approved budgets that are flawed and misappropriated. Currently, we are $50.8 million in debt, which would be unacceptable in any other school district but ours. We have numerous administrators that are making over $100,000 a year and our results are the worst in the country. While the leadership in the Rochester City School District is looking to finance the employment of “high end-level” administrators, it is taking away the valuable supports that are needed for our children to be successful (such as teachers who specialize in Reading, Writing, Math, & Technology, as well as special education and social/emotional staff).

I do not see any media outlets truly focusing on the major issues that directly affect our children. So, as a result, I will.

Posted by Ronald Hall on 10/31/2013 at 5:38 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENT: Still the best candidate for mayor: Tom Richards

I think you glossed over Tom Richards' supposed achievements by generalizing them, while giving specifics to the other candidates. It would have been nice for you to cite specific deeds Richards has done because I don't see that he's really any better than the other two. What is Richards' plan with Rochester? How does he intend to achieve these goals?

3 likes, 3 dislikes
Posted by Anthony Morelle on 10/31/2013 at 2:10 PM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Goods & Services

I still don't understand how Jeremiah's always gets best wings. Small wings with a limited choice for sauces. Dinosaur and Windjammer's beat them for taste and quality hands down.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Glenn Long on 10/30/2013 at 1:59 PM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Best Answers

Thank you for publishing this list. Love the multitude of sarcasm and typos throughout....brought a huge smile to my face! Monte Alanon...sounds like quite the aristocratic meeting!

Posted by ROCWEB on 10/30/2013 at 1:15 PM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Food & Drink

Love Rochester beer lovers. Clamor that they want to be recognized as a burgeoning center for craft beer in the Northeast., then lazily select a middling beer (AGAIN) to represent their city. Classic!

One step forward, two steps back...

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by benny on 10/30/2013 at 12:37 PM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Goods & Services

We at Gel salon are so proud of our stylist Heather DeMars for being a finalist in The Best of Rochester! Congrats Heather!!

3 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Missy Carducci on 10/30/2013 at 12:21 PM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Best Answers

"Monte Alanon"

"Casa Larva"

...I snorted.

Posted by Shannon on 10/30/2013 at 11:59 AM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Best Answers

Dear Rick: Thank you for the clarification! We've already got our art writer looped in so she can check it out soon. (For the record, the votes wouldn't have put it in contention for the Final 4.)

Posted by Eric Rezsnyak on 10/30/2013 at 11:57 AM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013: Best Answers

n the best answers section (probably one of my favorite by the way) I saw this:
--
What's in a name?
"Rochester Museum of Art" (Received 20 votes for Best Art Gallery; does not exist)
--
And perhaps my vote ended up going there because I was voting for Art Museum of Rochester which does exist...
https://www.facebook.com/ArtMuseumOfRochester

-Rick

1 like, 0 dislikes
Posted by Rick Houston on 10/30/2013 at 11:23 AM

Re: “Best of Rochester 2013

In the best answers section (probably one of my favorite by the way) I saw this:
--
What's in a name?
"Rochester Museum of Art" (Received 20 votes for Best Art Gallery; does not exist)
--
And perhaps my vote ended up going there because I was voting for Art Museum of Rochester which does exist...
https://www.facebook.com/ArtMuseumOfRochester

-Rick

3 likes, 1 dislike
Posted by Rick Houston on 10/30/2013 at 11:22 AM

Re: “White wants a Rochester 'for us, by us'

PHIL - "THE IGNORANCE OF THE PEOPLE IN ROCHESTER AMAZES ME"

Oh, the ironing...

Posted by J on 10/30/2013 at 10:01 AM

Re: “White wants a Rochester 'for us, by us'

@PHIL, your all caps posting really changed my mind. Thank you for your thoughtful, trenchant analysis.

4 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by Troll Whisperer on 10/29/2013 at 3:13 PM

Re: “White wants a Rochester 'for us, by us'

SO FILLING IN OUR INNER LOOP HELPS US HOW??? SO THEY CAN PUT MORE BEAUTY PROJECTS IN OUR CITY. WHERE ARE THE JOBS?? NEED JOBS TO PAY FOR THINGS. FUNDING BEAUTY PROJECTS WITH OUR TAX MONEY I RATHER FUND KIDS TO KEEP THEM IN SCHOOL SO THEY DONT END UP IN JAIL WHICH COSTS US MORE MONEY. THE IGNORANCE OF THE PEOPLE IN ROCHESTER AMAZES ME. ONLY IN ROCHESTER. AND YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE LEAVE.

0 likes, 5 dislikes
Posted by PHIL on 10/29/2013 at 2:15 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENTS: City Council and school board

To lorr: This newspaper is not and never has been funded by City Council or any other government body. We are an independent company owned by the two publishers and a diverse group of Rochester-area residents. Our funding comes from the sale of advertising.

3 likes, 24 dislikes
Posted by Mary Anna Towler on 10/29/2013 at 2:04 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENTS: City Council and school board

Howard why is everything with you have to do with race??? white this and that its not about race its about money and class and control. lovely warren lies, dave gannt lies, and now adam mcfadden is proposing frisk and search at random?? is this cool with you because they are all black. i assure you this has nothing to do with race, it has to do with who has the purse strings, stop with the race crap!!!

8 likes, 0 dislikes
Posted by tyron on 10/29/2013 at 1:38 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENTS: City Council and school board

The city newspaper is under city council rule. since the city newspaper is funded by the city council they are to lie and support these bully candidates. why would you write a piece on the green party only to mock them. Lovely Warren was caught lying about his her political contributor but that is okay. This white liberal paper needs to go. you only support who pays your bills. media is communism at its best!!

4 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by lorr on 10/29/2013 at 1:35 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENTS: City Council and school board

The know-nothing, elitist, dangerous, super-liberals at City Newspaper (whom, as far as I know, STILL, in 2013 don't have a single person of color on their reporting-staff, nor on their Editorial Board) had the intestinal fortitude, and unmitigated gall to write that: "Lori Thomas and Howard Eagle are knowledgeable and dedicated, but their combative style – for which neither apologizes – would cause serious problems on the school board."

If the thoroughly incompetent, tongue-in-cheekish, ineffective, bumps-on-a-log, entrenched, current, school board does not have "serious problems" --- it never will. In addition to being know-nothings, elitist, dangerous, and super-liberal --- the all-white City staff is also hypocritical. They tried hard to explain why two of the current, bumps-on-a-log, incompetents "deserve to be re-elected," and why apparently the third one doesn't, but their explanation falls woefully short regarding consistency, and logic. Everyone who is paying close attention knows that it's simply a matter of them preferring a familiar, palatable, soft-spoken, tongue-in-cheekish, go-along-to-get-along type black woman --- rather than the type who is quick to nicely tell super-liberals, and any other know-nothings, where to get off.

Since I see them as a big part of the problem, it's not very often that I agree with the Democrat and Chronicle's Editorial Board, especially regarding education issues. For example, their school board endorsement choices for the November 5th General Election is baffling (to say the least). However, I must agree wholeheartedly with one thing they wrote: "To endorse members of a board that oversees such a poorly performing district would be irresponsible, regardless of the individual strengths, talents and experience those members possess." AMEN!

So, not only are the all-white, know-nothing, elitist, dangerous, super-liberals at City Newspaper hypocritical, but in accordance with sound logic (provided by, of all the sources, the D&C's Editorial Board) --- they are also "irresponsible."

I'm certain that most people don't follow their recommendations, but since they don't have a clue about what / who is needed on then Board of Education, and/or in general --- both groups really ought to get out of the endorsement-business --- just as a matter of principle, which would give them more time to do a better job of objectively reporting, as opposed to influencing, and making news.

5 likes, 32 dislikes
Posted by Howard J. Eagle on 10/28/2013 at 7:16 PM

Re: “ENDORSEMENT: Still the best candidate for mayor: Tom Richards

This is what you wrote:
As Warren has noted repeatedly, Rochester is very much two communities: one is "growing, prosperous, and has a bright future." The other, "often invisible Rochester," she says, "is characterized by high rates of unemployment, crime, poverty, and despair."
The residents of both of those communities – but particularly those of the poorest and most vulnerable – need and deserve the best mayor possible. We remain convinced that Tom Richards is that person

Pardon me!!! Did I hear you right? Last time I checked, Mr. Richards has been our mayor for over 4 yours now. If he is the best mayor possible as you tend to believe, why, then, ‘’Rochester is, still, very much two communities’’.
Mayor Richards may be a good manager but not good enough to solve this city problems. Definitely, he is lacking of vision needed to solve the difficult situation of our city. Therefore, the citizens of Rochester need to move on, and elect the best candidate between the two competitors who are actively campaigning. I know Lovely Warren is the better fit for this job. I don’t need to list her qualifications because you already did.
Thus, I am calling the citizens of Rochester to confirm the choice that democrats made last September and elect Lovely Warren as our next mayor. DON'T ALLOW YOURSELF TO MISS THE BOAT THAT WILL MAKE HISTORY. ELLECT OUR FIRST FEMALE MAYOR.

7 likes, 10 dislikes
Posted by mabarry on 10/28/2013 at 11:29 AM

Re: “ENDORSEMENT: Still the best candidate for mayor: Tom Richards

Kathryn Quinn Thomas - That the voters selected Warren over Richards in last month's Democratic primary in no way, shape, or form precluded City from again endorsing Richards IF he had chosen to continue his campaign as a third party candidate as he had every right to do.

But the point that City, Richards’ cronies and hangers-ons, and now, possibly even Richards himself, are ignoring is that Richards WITHDREW from the campaign and threw his support to Warren

"I am announcing today that I am ending my campaign for reelection. ..."I believe that my announcement today will, and should mean that Lovely Warren will be elected our next Mayor. I intend to work to make that occur successfully and I urge everyone to do so as well.”

There are no second thoughts or do-overs after this kind of announcement..

An honorable man would keep his word and stay out of the race. An honorable newspaper would demand that he do so and would castigate and not endorse any back sliding.

We’ll have to wait and see where honor lies in Rochester politics.

9 likes, 4 dislikes
Posted by Ben Lewis on 10/28/2013 at 11:28 AM

Re: “ENDORSEMENT: Still the best candidate for mayor: Tom Richards

When a non partisan newspaper endorses a political canidate it should be viewed as journalistic suicide.

5 likes, 2 dislikes
Posted by Joey Lanzone on 10/28/2013 at 12:35 AM

Top Viewed Stories


© 2014 City Newspaper

Website powered by Foundation