http://www.rochestercitynewspaper.com/rochester/why-not-ban-guns/Content?oid=2134697 Comments On: Why not ban guns? by Mary Anna Towler en-us Copyright 2013 City Newspaper. All rights reserved. This RSS file is offered to individuals, City Newspaper readers, and non-commercial organizations only. Any commercial websites wishing to use this RSS file, please contact City Newspaper. mdeturck@rochester-citynews.com (City Newspaper Webmaster) Sat, 18 May 2013 00:00:01 -0400 Sat, 18 May 2013 21:15:00 -0400 Foundation http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Posted by Drew Beeman]]> Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:35:49 -0400 City Newspaper And having the police protect us worked out so well in NYC where all 9 bystanders shot were shot by police.
Posted by Lancer50]]> Sun, 02 Sep 2012 13:58:06 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Rochester Musician]]> Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:22:54 -0400 City Newspaper But if there were no guns, intruders wouldn't have them."

That's great logic - when a 240 lb criminal breaks into my house my 115 pound wife can take solace in the fact that even though she doesn't have a way to protect herself, he won't have a gun either.
Posted by rob]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:37:15 -0400 City Newspaper
After all, it would be more rational than going after guns. You're vastly more likely to be an abortion victim than a gun victim.
Posted by j.a.m.]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:13:36 -0400 City Newspaper
Prior to 1865 the ownership of human beings was also a "Constitutional right" in the United States,.
Posted by Chaim DeLoye]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:26:51 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Bryan Thompson]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:37:41 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Don Murphy]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:16:46 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Mark Penner]]> Fri, 31 Aug 2012 01:54:52 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Don Murphy]]> Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:06:27 -0400 City Newspaper Posted by Ken Maher]]> Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:56:28 -0400 City Newspaper