Recent Comments
Re: “Next to paranormal”
To Yvonne Cleveland - Amen sister!
I am ecstatic at your ability through strength of faith in being able to assist a family in need.
God bless you sister.
Re: “Next to paranormal”
No I posted a response to your moaning ghost commentary and they yanked it. So yes there is censorship which won't do them any good since I'll just post it through my own. Already hundreds know of their censoring of which many felt was inappropriate and somewhat quick on their part.
Re: “Next to paranormal”
I see censorship is alive and well.
Re: “Next to paranormal”
Stop your moaning.
I've as many negative votes as you but unlike you I see them all as a positive since even negative attention is still attention.
And we all know how much the populace loves all the intrigue and mud slinging .
So turn that frown upside down and smile in the face of adversity.
Re: “Next to paranormal”
I thought it was a great article the moment it began covering the third group over at http://beyond-known.com.
And when compared to all the other bs in this city did I see no harm in this paper having published the piece of which it did on the paranormal.
Willie Clark did a phenomenal job even though I detest the first infantile group covered while having no opinion on the 2nd.
Re: “Next to paranormal”
To Ted Christopher - I followed your advice in researching the 2005 "Times" piece " A New Home, Not Quite Vacated" by Susan Millar Perry - of which I found to be excellently written and most concise regarding for what many have described from such experience.
Thank you for the suggestion.