Recent Comments
Re: “The next act for the RPO”
Liane Curtis - In a different venue you directed the following to Ms. Rice, "I feel it is fair to ask for an election for Board members that offers a choice and is conducted in accordance with democratic principles. Why are you opposed to that?". I in response posted a question, which was deleted before you could respond, asking what "democratic principles" you believe the RPO board violated under their bylaws. Luckily you now have a second opportunity to answer.
Re: “The next act for the RPO”
Mr Maurer, you claim that you and other members of the RPO were denied a voice by the board's actions. Yet you as moderator of the so-called RPO Community Supporters site have openly admitted to deleting comments with which you disagree. In fact you did so to me this evening. Does this perchance seem a tad hypocritical?
Re: “RBJ poll heavily favors Richards”
"It’s important to keep in mind, though, that the RBJ caters to a more affluent, business-oriented readership — which is in sync with Richards’ background as a lawyer and business executive."
The RBJ also caters to Rpublicans. And considering that Richards is a Democrat-in-name-only it's hardly a surprise that he did so well in this poll.